2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.palaeo.2022.110894
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Zircon geochronology of the new dinosaur fauna in the Middle Jurassic lower Shaximiao Formation in Chongqing, SW China

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[15–18]). Recently, a new zircon U-Pb age from Yunyang geochronology yielded a maximum depositional age of 166.0 ± 1.5 Ma (late Middle Jurassic) below the bone-bearing horizon of the Lower Shaximiao Formation [19]. In general, we suggest the bone-bearing horizon may belong to the Bathonian.…”
Section: Systematic Palaeontologymentioning
confidence: 70%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…[15–18]). Recently, a new zircon U-Pb age from Yunyang geochronology yielded a maximum depositional age of 166.0 ± 1.5 Ma (late Middle Jurassic) below the bone-bearing horizon of the Lower Shaximiao Formation [19]. In general, we suggest the bone-bearing horizon may belong to the Bathonian.…”
Section: Systematic Palaeontologymentioning
confidence: 70%
“…Although a series of detrital zircon U-Pb geochronology for this formation in the Sichuan Basin was carried on, the accurate age for this formation is still controversial (e.g. [15][16][17][18] Jurassic) below the bone-bearing horizon of the Lower Shaximiao Formation [19]. In general, we suggest the bone-bearing horizon may belong to the Bathonian.…”
Section: Locality and Horizonmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These two sections were correlated using regional makers, such as maximum flooding surfaces, regional black shale beds or mudstone, and limestone tops. Stratigraphic ages were constrained and assigned based on published isotopic ages (Xu et al, 2017;Xu et al, 2021;Zhou et al, 2022) and biostratigraphic studies (Wang et al, 2018;Huang, 2019), using the timescale by Gradstein and Ogg, (2020). Although these ages are with uncertainties, they will not significantly influence the results and conclusions.…”
Section: Stratigraphic Correlation Of the Boreholesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The comparisons below are restricted to vertebrae from the anterior-to-middle part of the dorsal series. For this reason, we exclude from comparisons several pre-Late Jurassic sauropods for which there are no dorsal vertebrae or for which no information is available, such as Vulcanodon (Africa) or Nebulasaurus , Chinshakiangosaurus , and Anhuilong (Asia), as well as sauropods whose age assignments have been moved forward into the Late Jurassic, such as Shunosaurus (Oxfordian; Wang et al, 2018; but see Zhou et al, 2022) and Rhoetosaurus (early Oxfordian or younger; Todd et al, 2019).…”
Section: Comparisons With Other Early–middle Jurassic Sauropodsmentioning
confidence: 99%