Značilnosti opravljanja sečnje in spravila v zasebnih gozdovih v Sloveniji

Abstract

A survey conducted in 2019 covered 544 randomly selected forest owners. More than half of the forest owners own a forest estate ranging from 1 to 4.99 ha. For 62 % of respondents, the primary purpose of forest management is to harvest wood for their own needs. In 2015%2019, 71 % of respondents carried out felling and skidding in their forests. In total, approximately 50,000 m3 of wood was felled (24 m3 /ha or 141 m3 per holding). The largest volumes were felled by private owners with small forest holdings (up to 0.99 ha), on average 41.4 m3 /ha. There were statistically significant differences between the size of the forest holding and the average volume of annual felling. Furthermore, there were no statistically significant differences in felling intensity between male and female forest owners. The survey found that professional contractors carried out 41 % of felling and harvesting. Furthermore, there were significant differences between the size of the private forest estate and the method of performing forest operations. The results showed that the largest share of private owners who carry out all felling and skidding with the help of hired contractors is in the size class of forest holdings from 5 to 9.99 ha. The study did not confirm statistically significant differences in the intensity of felling between male and female private forest owners.

Deal for Green?

“…However, the results of the survey show that male private forest owners harvested somewhat more intensively during the period under consideration. Studies abroad also confirm that male forest owners harvest more than female forest owners (Kuuluvainen et al, 2014;Ščap et al, 2021).…”

The heterogeneity of private forest owners affects the wood mobilization from private forests

“…However, the results of the survey show that male private forest owners harvested somewhat more intensively during the period under consideration. Studies abroad also confirm that male forest owners harvest more than female forest owners (Kuuluvainen et al, 2014;Ščap et al, 2021).…”

Uncovering the Latent Preferences of Slovenia’s Private Forest Owners in the Context of Enhancing Forest Ecosystem Services through a Hypothetical Scheme

“…In some cases, the percentage of passive forest owners can be discouragingly high. Pezdevšek Malovrh et al [111] suggest that the segment of passive forest owners is significant in Slovenia, reaching levels as high as over 30%, while Ščap et al [116] report that almost a quarter (23%) have no intentions for regular logging. Recently, Matilainen and Lahdesmaki [114] revealed that the share of passive forest owners in Finland is even larger, with 35% identified as totally passive, while an additional 12% and 16% exhibit passiveness specifically in terms of timber sales and forest management, respectively.…”