“…A comparison of the SBB in different conditions is shown in Figure . It is noteworthy that the measured value is higher than the ideally predicted value based on the electron affinity rule (ϕ B = Φ M – χ S = 1.2 eV; Φ M is the work function of Au; χ S is the electron affinity of ZnO), ,, and the reported value (ϕ B = 0.7–1.2 eV) measured from typical IV and CV measurements. − Several concepts are invoked to the unusually high band bending for Au NP-decorated ZnO surfaces: (1) according to Schottky–Mott theory, electrons flow from the ZnO NWs to the Au NPs until both the Fermi levels line up, leading to the open-circuit nano-Schottky junctions; , (2) due to the ∼40% coverage rate of randomly distributed Au NPs, there are still oxygen molecules on the NW surfaces capturing electrons inside the NWs and altering the surface Fermi level of the NWs; ,− (3) spillover effect: Au NPs catalytically activate the formation of charged oxygen molecules, greatly increasing the quantity of oxygen adsorbates at the surface of ZnO NWs. ,, Due to the combination of the above effects, a greater amount of electrons drawn from the core of the Au NP-decorated NWs than the pristine NWs can be obtained, giving rise to the severe band bending. , Au NPs at ZnO surfaces creating Schottky junctions and enhancing the formation of the oxygen adsorbates amplify the separation of electron–hole pairs and further enhance the UV photogain of ZnO NW PDs . Additionally, we do note that the enhanced photogain by Au decoration could cause from either (1) the increased oxygen absorption on the surface due to the presence of Au , or (2) the surface plasmon-enhanced light absorption by the decorated Au nanopartices .…”