2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.egypro.2011.10.164
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ZnO/CdTe and ZnO/CdS core-shell nanowire arrays for extremely thin absorber solar cells

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…But low photoenergy conversion efficiency of ZnO (probably because of their relatively low charge separation efficiency and fast recombination of charge carriers) (Tamaki et al 2009) forced many scientists to improve the photocatalytic efficiencies in ZnO by suppression of the recombination of photogenerated electron-hole pairs. Such examples include SnO 2 /ZnO, ZnO/In 2 O 3 , Pt/ZnO, ZnO/ZnS, Bi 2 S 3 /ZnO, ZnO/ CdS , CdS/CdSe (Murugadoss 2012), ZnO/ CdS (Sahi and Chen 2013), CeF 3 /ZnO (Salazar et al 2011), ZnO/CdTe and ZnO/CdS (Shirakata 2013), ZnO/CdS/Cu(In, Ga)Se 2 (Chang et al 2013), ZnO/CuO (Tamez et al 2012), SnO 2 -ZnO , CdS/ZnO (Dongguang et al 2012), Ag/ZnO-C (Yu et al 2013), Pt-ZnO (Zhang et al 2012), and CdS/CdSe (Song et al 2009). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But low photoenergy conversion efficiency of ZnO (probably because of their relatively low charge separation efficiency and fast recombination of charge carriers) (Tamaki et al 2009) forced many scientists to improve the photocatalytic efficiencies in ZnO by suppression of the recombination of photogenerated electron-hole pairs. Such examples include SnO 2 /ZnO, ZnO/In 2 O 3 , Pt/ZnO, ZnO/ZnS, Bi 2 S 3 /ZnO, ZnO/ CdS , CdS/CdSe (Murugadoss 2012), ZnO/ CdS (Sahi and Chen 2013), CeF 3 /ZnO (Salazar et al 2011), ZnO/CdTe and ZnO/CdS (Shirakata 2013), ZnO/CdS/Cu(In, Ga)Se 2 (Chang et al 2013), ZnO/CuO (Tamez et al 2012), SnO 2 -ZnO , CdS/ZnO (Dongguang et al 2012), Ag/ZnO-C (Yu et al 2013), Pt-ZnO (Zhang et al 2012), and CdS/CdSe (Song et al 2009). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even if the same deposition parameters are used as for CdTe thin fihns solar cells, the atoms might not have enough kinetic energy to diffuse along the entire surface area of the nanowires [9]. This represents a limiting factor for fabricating a uniform thin fihn on the nanowires surface regarding the height, diameter, density and the tilt of the nanowires in order to avoid the shadowing effects.…”
Section: A Znoiabsorber Nanostructurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…5,6 Different deposition techniques like: Chemical Bath Deposition (CBD), QD functionalization, Close Space Sublimation (CSS), Successive Ion Layer Adsorption and Reaction (SILAR), Metal Organic Chemical Vapor Deposition (MOCVD), Vapor Phase Epitaxy (VPE), and electrophoretic deposition (EPD) have been used to deposit the absorber layer onto mesoscopic oxide (e.g., TiO 2 ) lms. 3,4,7 QDSSCs typically exhibit lower power conversion efficiency when comparable to DSSCs or thin lm solar cells, however, their efficiency has considerably increased from 1% to over 8%. Factors that limit the overall power conversion efficiency is the limited harvesting of the incident light, slow hole transfer rate, back electron transfer to the redox couple, or low counter electrode performance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%