2012
DOI: 10.1088/0268-1242/27/7/074009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ZnO, ZnMnO and ZnCoO films grown by atomic layer deposition

Abstract: Despite many efforts the origin of a ferromagnetic (FM) response in ZnMnO and ZnCoO is still not clear. Magnetic investigations of our samples, not discussed here, show that the room temperature FM response is observed only in alloys with a non-uniform Mn or Co distribution. Thus, the control of their distribution is crucial for explanation of contradicted magnetic properties of ZnCoO and ZnMnO reported till now. In the present review we discuss advantages of the Atomic Layer Deposition (ALD) growth method, wh… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
13
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
3
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Curie-Weiss temperature is equal to about θ = −78 K. The negative sign of this value suggests a contribution of the antiferromagnetically coupled Co-Co pairs, as often reported for a Zn 1−x Co x O system[41]. The contribution of such pairs to the magnetic response was also observed in electron spin resonance (ESR) investigations of Zn 1−x Co x O bulk samples[79]. Surprisingly, as shown inFigure 12a, the M(H) measurements reveal nearly the same magnetization up to H = 0.5 kOe for samples with different Co fractions, that is, the magnetization does not scale with Co fraction in the samples.…”
supporting
confidence: 67%
“…The Curie-Weiss temperature is equal to about θ = −78 K. The negative sign of this value suggests a contribution of the antiferromagnetically coupled Co-Co pairs, as often reported for a Zn 1−x Co x O system[41]. The contribution of such pairs to the magnetic response was also observed in electron spin resonance (ESR) investigations of Zn 1−x Co x O bulk samples[79]. Surprisingly, as shown inFigure 12a, the M(H) measurements reveal nearly the same magnetization up to H = 0.5 kOe for samples with different Co fractions, that is, the magnetization does not scale with Co fraction in the samples.…”
supporting
confidence: 67%
“…However, rapid progress in the search for ferromagnetic DMSs stems, to a large extent, from the development of methods enabling material synthesis far from thermal equilibrium, primarily by molecular beam epitaxy (MBE) (Ohno, 1998), but also by pulsed-laser deposition (PLD) (Fukumura et al, 2005), metalorganic vapor phase epitaxy (MOVPE) (Bonanni, 2007), atomic layer deposition (ALD) ( Lukasiewicz et al, 2012), sputtering (Fukumura et al, 2005), ion implantation (Pearton et al, 2003), and pulsed-laser melting of implanted layers (Scarpulla et al, 2008;Zhou et al, 2012). These methods have a potential to provide high-quality DMS films with a concentration of the magnetic constituent beyond the solubility limits at thermal equilibrium.…”
Section: A Growth Methods and Diagramsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…39). The specific character of the ALD technique means that our samples are deposited as (ZnO) m (CoO) n periodic structures with various combinations of m and n values.…”
Section: A Growth Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…12,39,41 As displayed in Table I and shown in Fig. 1(b), textured films with dominant orientation of the c axis along the growth direction (e.g., PM-1 and PM-3), perpendicular to it (e.g., PM-S1), or films with no texture (samples PM-2 and PM-4) can be prepared.…”
Section: B Investigated Samplesmentioning
confidence: 99%