1988
DOI: 10.1007/bfb0118786
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Zodiacal dust properties as deduced by inversion of iras observations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
1

Year Published

1997
1997
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
17
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This gives us further confidence that we have no serious source of systematic error in the calibration of our sky brightness values. (We do note, however, that Levasseur-Regourd and Dumont (1980) found 108 S 10 (V) for the zodiacal light at our mean ecliptic coordinates.) Garstang's (1989) Eqs.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 49%
“…This gives us further confidence that we have no serious source of systematic error in the calibration of our sky brightness values. (We do note, however, that Levasseur-Regourd and Dumont (1980) found 108 S 10 (V) for the zodiacal light at our mean ecliptic coordinates.) Garstang's (1989) Eqs.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 49%
“…For each target, it is assumed that the observation occurs at the time of the year when the zodiacal background is minimal, which is about 40 days before or after opposition for most targets. The resulting zodiacal background, derived from Levasseur-Regourd & Dumont (1980), is a function of ecliptic latitude, and ranges from m V ¼ 23:28 (ecliptic poles) to m V ¼ 22:24 (ecliptic equator).…”
Section: Zodiacal Lightmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, the images were divided by a normalized median combination of 16 twilight exposures to remove the basic instrumental response. Significant structure was left because of the color difference between the blue twilight sky and the yellow zodiacal light dominating the '' dark '' sky near the Pleiades (Levasseur-Regourd & Dumont 1980;Schoening 1992). As a second correction, each field was divided by a 3 -clipped median average of 13 dark-sky fields taken away from the cluster during nights 1 and 2.…”
Section: Initial Reductionmentioning
confidence: 99%