2009
DOI: 10.4319/lom.2009.7.304
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Zooplankton biomass estimation from digitized images: a comparison between subtropical and Antarctic organisms

Abstract: The measurement of mesozooplankton biomass in the ocean requires the use of analytical procedures that destroy the samples. Alternatively, the development of methods to estimate biomass from optical systems and appropriate conversion factors could be a compromise between the accuracy of analytical methods and the need to preserve the samples for further taxonomic studies. The conversion of the body area recorded by an optical counter or a camera, by converting the digitized area of an organism into individual … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
58
0
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
58
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Then the carbon requirement of zooplankton (Z Creq ), could be expressed in mgC m −2 d −1 as (Nival et al, 1975), Z Creq = Ration · B zoo , where B zoo is the biomass of zooplankton in mgC m −3 , calculated using size-carbon weight relationships from Lehette and Hernández-León (2009) and Mauchline (1998) applied on samples of the WP2 (that quantitatively samples zooplankton in the size range [0.4:2.8] mm ESD). The Ration is defined following Nival et al (1975) as a function of growth rate g z , respiration r and assimilation efficiency A.…”
Section: Primary Production and Zooplankton Carbon Requirementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then the carbon requirement of zooplankton (Z Creq ), could be expressed in mgC m −2 d −1 as (Nival et al, 1975), Z Creq = Ration · B zoo , where B zoo is the biomass of zooplankton in mgC m −3 , calculated using size-carbon weight relationships from Lehette and Hernández-León (2009) and Mauchline (1998) applied on samples of the WP2 (that quantitatively samples zooplankton in the size range [0.4:2.8] mm ESD). The Ration is defined following Nival et al (1975) as a function of growth rate g z , respiration r and assimilation efficiency A.…”
Section: Primary Production and Zooplankton Carbon Requirementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zooplankton estimated dry weight of each vignette was calculated from its area using the regression equation obtained for 30 mesozooplankton by Lehette and Hernández-León (2009 Below, the terms -ZOOSCAN abundance‖ and -ZOOSCAN biomass‖ will indicate values derived from the laboratory ZOOSCAN processing. The abundance and biomass of organisms were first calculated for four size fractions (< 500, 500-1000, 1000-2000 and > 2000 μm) based on their ECD, and then summed to deliver the total average abundance and biomass per sample over the upper 200 m. 5…”
Section: Abundance Biomass and Size Structure Using The Zooscanmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The carbon weight is calculated from the ESD of each object (both for the LOPC and the WP2/Zs) following ESD-to-dry weight (Lehette and Hernández-León, 2009) and dry weight-to-carbon (Mauchline, 1998) conversion equations:…”
Section: Size Spectra Calculationmentioning
confidence: 99%