Zum Status der Psychotherapieforschung im deutschen Sprachraum - Eine bibliometrische Analyse dreier deutschsprachiger Zeitschriften

Objectics: The evolution of research activity during the last thirty years on regenerative periodontal surgery is studied. Results: A small number of authors are highly productive with more than 10 publications on the subject each. 79,6% of authors have only produced one article on the subject. The co-authorship average is of 2,68 authors per paper, with a collaboration between 2 and 6 authors. Main journals on the field of regenerative periodontal surgery are Journal of Periodontology and Journal of Clinical Periodontology, which are ranked 14th and 1st in their category according to the Journal Citations Reports. The most used language is English, followed by Japanese and Italian, Spanish occupying the eighth position. Conclusions: A significant increase on scientific literature is observed, similar to the one Dentistry has had. A reduced number of authors account for most production. In the same token, there is a scarce professionalization of researchers in this field, where most of the authors are occasional. On the other hand, there are two very specialized journals on this topic. Key words:Bibliometrics, scientometrics periodontal regeneration, surgical periodontal treatment, scientific literature, scopus, scientific output.

show abstract

“…Similar studies have been conducted in disciplines such as Psychology (17,18), Medicine (19,20) or Education (21,22). …”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 60%

Bibliometric analysis of research on regenerative periodontal surgery during the last 30 years

Gutiérrez-Vela¹,

Díaz-Haro²,

Berbel-Salvador³

et al. 2012

J Clin Exp Dent

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“… 1 includes same journal; 2 English includes two cites in non-English articles (1 in French, 1 in Italian); 3 15/16 cites are linked to the prolific editor of Z Psychiatr, Psychol Psychother as author of citing articles 4 If articles were taken into account that seem to have been published, at least in part, out of bibliometric interest or ambition [9,10] this number would shrink by 13 to 21 (reducing the rate of cites by other authors and journals to 19%).Fortschr Neurol Psychiatr, Fortschritte der Neurologie und Psychiatrie; Nervenarzt, Der Nervenarzt; Nervenheilkunde, Nervenheilkunde; Psychiatr Prax, Psychiatrische Praxis, Z Psychiatr, Psychol Psychother, Zeitschrift für Psychiatrie, Psychologie und Psychotherapie.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

The production and recognition of psychiatric original articles published in languages other than English

Baethge¹

2013

BMC Psychiatry

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

BackgroundWhereas the most influential journals in psychiatry are English language journals, periodicals published in other languages serve an important purpose for local communities of clinicians and researchers. This study aimed at analyzing the scientific production and the recognition of non-English general psychiatry journals.MethodsIn a cohort study, the 2009 volume of ten journals from Brazil (1), German language countries (5), France (2), Italy (1), and Poland (1) was searched for original articles. Patterns of citations to these articles during 2010 and 2011 as documented in Web of Science were analyzed.ResultsThe journals published 199 original articles (range: 4–46), mostly observational studies. Half of the papers were cited in the following two years. There were 246 citations received, or an average of 1.25 cites per article (range: 0.25-4.04). Many of these citations came from the local community, that is, from the same authors and journals. Citations by other periodicals and other authors accounted for 36% [95%-CI: 30%-42%], citations in English sources for 33% [28%-39%] of all quotations. There was considerable heterogeneity with regard to citations received among the ten journals investigated.ConclusionNon-English language general psychiatry journals contribute substantially to the body of research. However, recognition, and in particular recognition by the international research community is moderate.

show abstract

“…These articles generated a substantial number of citations to the quoted journals during the timespan relevant to the calculation of the impact factor. In a similar approach, in 2010, authors published a bibliometric analysis on "Psychotherapy research in the Germanspeaking community" on the basis of the volumes 2008 and 2009 of 3 German language journals [8], among them Zeitschrift für Psychiatrie, Psychologie und Psychotherapie, another of the journals included in this study. The same line of research was pursued in a 2011 paper on "Gender in mental-health research" [9]: the authors analyzed articles in 3 German language journals, published in the years 2009 and 2010.…”

Section: Quotation Patternsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The same line of research was pursued in a 2011 paper on "Gender in mental-health research" [9]: the authors analyzed articles in 3 German language journals, published in the years 2009 and 2010. In total, 6 quoting articles employed the method of reviewing publications in a restricted number of German-language journals in the preceding 2 years [7][8][9][10][11][12]. The preceding 2 years were also the frame of reference for an editorial in Fortschritte der Psychiatrie und Neurologie on how a particular topic (dementia research) had been covered in the same periodical [13].…”

Section: Quotation Patternsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Importance, Errors, and Patterns of Quotations to Psychiatric Original Articles

Baethge

2020

Pharmacopsychiatry

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introduction A substantial rate of quotation errors has been reported in medical journal publications: about 25% of all quotations are wrong. It is, however, entirely unclear how important quotation errors are for the message of quoting articles. Methods This is a case study in form of a retrospective quotation analysis of a cohort of 72 psychiatric original articles (index articles) from 5 German-language general psychiatric journals. Main outcomes were importance and accuracy of quotations from the 2 calendar years following the publication of index articles. Results Fifty-one index articles were quoted 235 times in 109 quoting articles. Almost all quotations were of medium (76% [95% CI: 70%; 81%]) or high (20% [15%, 25%]) importance for the message of the quoting paper. Regarding quotation accuracy, 44 quotations (19% [14%; 24%]) were rated as minor, and 51 (22% [17%; 27%]) as major errors. In multivariable analyses, no statistically significant and practically relevant factors associated with quotation inaccuracy emerged, such as self-quotation, impact factor of the quoting journal, or importance. Among quoting articles, 7 (6% [3%; 13%]) showed a pattern of predominantly quoting index articles from the time span relevant to the calculation of the impact factor. Discussion Quotations are important for the message of the quoting paper. Therefore, quotation errors may be detrimental to scientific reasoning and may undermine public trust in medical science. The present investigation is a case study, and its results are exploratory. While it is plausible that the findings translate into other environments, independent replication is needed.

show abstract

Zum Status der Psychotherapieforschung im deutschen Sprachraum - Eine bibliometrische Analyse dreier deutschsprachiger Zeitschriften

Cited by 6 publications

References 84 publications

Bibliometric analysis of research on regenerative periodontal surgery during the last 30 years

Bibliometric analysis of research on regenerative periodontal surgery during the last 30 years

The production and recognition of psychiatric original articles published in languages other than English

Importance, Errors, and Patterns of Quotations to Psychiatric Original Articles

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About