Although the effects of various morphine-like analgesics on pain, respiration, body temperature, and gastrointestinal propulsion have been extensively examined and compared in several animal species, the antitussive action of these compounds has received relatively little attention. We therefore compared analgesics of several distinct chemical types, and also pholcodine and narcotine. For most of these comparisons we used the method of Domenjoz (1952) (Dickinson, 1950). The pulse potential (usually 1-5 volts) was adjusted so as to cause a series of inspiratory gasps. These were recorded by a lightly sprung lever attached by a thread to the skin just below the sternum. An example of the type of tracing obtained is shown in Fig. 1. This method of stimulation was also tried in dogs, but, like Domenjoz (1952), we failed to produce a similar effect in this species.A simple mechanical method-passing a thin polythene tube in and out of the trachea two or three times-was used to elicit short bursts of coughing in anaesthetized cats, dogs. and guinea-pigs.Chemical stimulation was also used in unconscious animals. In cats and guinea-pigs 0.05 ml. (or less if effective) of S02 at atmospheric pressure, withdrawn fioom an S02 syphon in a syringe, was introduced into the tracheal cannula. This regularly caused coughing when, as in our experiments, an interval of about 8 min. was allowed between tests. In dogs these small volumes of undiluted S02 did not always induce coughing, and after larger amounts the animals frequently became refractory. More consistent responses were obtained by making the animal breathe an approximately I :100 dilution of S02 in air from a bag until coughing occurred or for a maximum of 3 breaths, but some animals became refractory, and we have therefore reported only those experiments in which the S02 effect subsequently returned after suppression by an analgesic. Like the responses to electrical stimulation, those due to mechanical and chemical irritation were recorded from the abdomen except in three experiments in which a body plethysmograph, of the type described by Dawes, Mott, and Widdicombe (1951), was used to examine the nature of the responses more closely. These were found after each of the three types of stimulation to consist of one or more deep inspirations each followed by rapid forced expiration. The first inspiration was usually, but not invariably, preceded by a rapid expiratory movement.Analgesics and other drugs were given intravenously in all experiments. In most experiments, including all of those in Table I, increasing doses in the series 001, 0.03, 0.1, 0.3, 1.0, 3.0, 10, and 30 mg./kg. were given. Sufficient time for recovery, or 10 min. after ineffective amounts, was generally allowed between doses.Development of acute tolerance to the respiratory depressant action of codeine was investigated in cats anaesthetized with pentobarbitone sodium by comparing the action on respiratory minute-volume (recorded as by Gaddum, 1941) of a single large dose of codeine with that of a series...