2007
DOI: 10.1002/zaac.200700156
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Zur Bildung einer Zinn‐Zinn‐Bindung in Bis(hexamethyldisilazyl)‐Zinn(II) unter C‐H Bindungsbruch

Abstract: Bis(hexamethyldisilazyl)tin(II) in excess reacts with the molecular alumosiloxane (Ph 2 SiO) 8 (AlO(OH)) 4 to yield the well known tin(II) derivative (Ph 2 SiO) 8 (AlO 2 ) 4 Sn 2 and the novel bicyclic [(Me 3 Si) 2 N]Sn[N(SiMe 3 )SiMe 2 CH 2 ] 2 Sn[N(SiMe 3 ) 2 ] containing a tin-tin bond, which is formally related to the starting molecule by a missing hydrogen atom. From X-ray diffraction studies on single crystals it follows that the new compound has almost C 2 point symmetry (the twofold axis intersecting t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is presumably due to the increased electrophilicity of Sn1, which is a four-coordinate tin center (although still formally tin­(II)) involved in a formal dative covalent bond with Sn2. The Sn–Sn bond length is measured to be 2.870(1) Å, which is slightly longer than that expected based on the covalent radius of tin ( r cov = 1.39 Å; ∑ r cov = 2.78 Å) , and is slightly longer than the distances observed in hexaphenylditin and a similar heterocyclic compound which resulted from loss of hydrogen from the trimethylsilylamide ligand, [Sn­{N­(SiMe 3 ) 2 }­{N­(SiMe 3 )­(SiMe 2 CH 2 )}] 2 , , for which the Sn–Sn bond lengths are 2.770(4) and 2.737(2) Å, respectively. That being said, a search of the Cambridge Structural Database reveals a wide range in Sn–Sn bond lengths, which easily extend beyond 3 Å, indicating the elasticity of the bond, whose length may be significantly influenced by the steric influence of the ligands as much as the electronic properties of the bonding interaction.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is presumably due to the increased electrophilicity of Sn1, which is a four-coordinate tin center (although still formally tin­(II)) involved in a formal dative covalent bond with Sn2. The Sn–Sn bond length is measured to be 2.870(1) Å, which is slightly longer than that expected based on the covalent radius of tin ( r cov = 1.39 Å; ∑ r cov = 2.78 Å) , and is slightly longer than the distances observed in hexaphenylditin and a similar heterocyclic compound which resulted from loss of hydrogen from the trimethylsilylamide ligand, [Sn­{N­(SiMe 3 ) 2 }­{N­(SiMe 3 )­(SiMe 2 CH 2 )}] 2 , , for which the Sn–Sn bond lengths are 2.770(4) and 2.737(2) Å, respectively. That being said, a search of the Cambridge Structural Database reveals a wide range in Sn–Sn bond lengths, which easily extend beyond 3 Å, indicating the elasticity of the bond, whose length may be significantly influenced by the steric influence of the ligands as much as the electronic properties of the bonding interaction.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…[6a] Interestingly, contrasting reactivity is observed for the lithium salt of same ditopic carbanionic N-heterocyclic carbene, There are a handful of reported examples of the bis(trimethylsilyl)amide ligand being deprotonated in basic reaction media to afford metallacycles. [10][11][12][13][14] The basicity of the amide by-product is likely to also be increased due to the presence of IPr in solution. IPr has been shown to readily coordinate to lithium cations, hence, any amide aggregates which may form in solution are likely to be more basic, much as the reactivity of n BuLi is enhanced by the addition of a chelating ligand such as TMEDA (tetramethylethylenediamine).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An unusual reaction between Sn(N{SiMe 3 } 2 ) 2 105 and the molecular alumosiloxane (Ph 2 SiO) 8 (AlO{OH}) 4 afforded, in addition to the known tin derivative (Ph 2 SiO) 8 (AlO 2 ) 4 Sn 2 , the bicyclic compound 153 containing a Sn Sn bond [121]. In a similar reaction, metallation of the diphosphanylsilane Si(i-Pr) 2 (PHMe) 2 with stannylene 105 generated a polycyclic compound consisting of a Sn 3 P 4 Si 2 core unit which contains an Sn Sn bond (154, Fig.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%