2002
DOI: 10.1024//0170-1789.23.2.217
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Zur empirischen Unterscheidung von Scham und Schuld

Abstract: Zusammenfassung: Aus unterschiedlichen theoretischen Perspektiven ist die Bedeutung der Emotionen Scham und Schuld für die Entstehung psychischer Störungen kontrovers diskutiert worden. Bislang wurden die unterstellten Zusammenhänge empirisch noch nicht zufrieden stellend untersucht, da derzeit wenige gut evaluierte Erhebungsinstrumente zur Erfassung und Differenzierung von Scham und Schuld vorliegen. Aufgrund dieses Mangels soll in der vorliegenden Arbeit die deutsche Version des “Test of Self-Conscious Affec… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Given their trait‐like nature, self‐esteem and shame were also entered as variables into the regression equation within this group of predictors: self‐esteem (FSSW) was measured with the respective 10‐item subscale of the Frankfurter Selbstkonzeptskalen (FSKN, Frankfurt Self Concept Scales; Deusinger, ). As a measure of shame, we used the respective 15‐item subscale of the German translation of the Test of Self‐Conscious Affects (TOSCA; Kocherscheidt, Fiedler, Kronmueller, Backenstrass, & Mundt, ). The subscale provided excellent internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.90 in a clinical sample; Kocherscheidt et al, ). Interpersonal problems and attachment style.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Given their trait‐like nature, self‐esteem and shame were also entered as variables into the regression equation within this group of predictors: self‐esteem (FSSW) was measured with the respective 10‐item subscale of the Frankfurter Selbstkonzeptskalen (FSKN, Frankfurt Self Concept Scales; Deusinger, ). As a measure of shame, we used the respective 15‐item subscale of the German translation of the Test of Self‐Conscious Affects (TOSCA; Kocherscheidt, Fiedler, Kronmueller, Backenstrass, & Mundt, ). The subscale provided excellent internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.90 in a clinical sample; Kocherscheidt et al, ). Interpersonal problems and attachment style.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a measure of shame, we used the respective 15‐item subscale of the German translation of the Test of Self‐Conscious Affects (TOSCA; Kocherscheidt, Fiedler, Kronmueller, Backenstrass, & Mundt, ). The subscale provided excellent internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.90 in a clinical sample; Kocherscheidt et al, ). Interpersonal problems and attachment style. The German version of the Inventory of Interpersonal Problems (IIP‐D) measures self‐reflected difficulties with other people.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Test of Self-Conscious Affect (TOSCA). The TOSCA (Kocherscheidt, Fiedler, Kronmüller, Backenstrass, & Mundt, 2002;Tangney, Wagner, & Gramzow, 1989) assesses characteristic responses to 10 affectively negative and 5 affectively positive scenarios. Probabilities for each potential response are rated on 5-point scales ranging from 1 (not likely) to 5 (very likely).…”
Section: Saarbrücker Persönlichkeits-fragebogen -Interpersonalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To measure proneness to shame, we used the subscale ‘proneness to shame’ (TOSCA-SHAME) of the short version of the Test of Self-Conscious Affect-3 (TOSCA-3; 32 , 53 ). The short version comprises 11 scenarios describing negative social events (e.g., “While playing around, you throw a ball and it hits your friend in the face”).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%