2020
DOI: 10.1628/978-3-16-158574-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Zwischen Gelehrsamkeit und konfessioneller Identitätsstiftung

Abstract: Wie bestimmten Vertreter des frühen Luthertums den historischen Ort der Reformation? Wie hing die Geschichtsschreibung des Luthertums mit seiner »konfessionellen Identität » zusammen? Matthias Pohlig untersucht die Frage nach Argumentationsmustern eines lutherischen »Gedächtnisses« zum Zwecke der Identitätskonstruktion und die Frage nach dem Verhältnis dieses Gedächtnisses zur Geschichtsschreibung und -theorie des 16. Jahrhunderts. Lutherische Autoren wiesen der Geschichte unterschiedliche Funktionen zu: die a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1
1
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
7
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…One should rather take into account an interpretation of apocalypticism, and apocalyptic exegesis in particular, as a largely self-referential discourse instead of a mere discourse of crisis and not overstate the practical consequences of apocalyptic interpretations. 111 The lack of exegetic consistency and the at times contradictory historical interpretations, a feature of Lutheran commentaries as well, fit into this understanding of apocalyptic exegesis. 112 This becomes evident in the treatment of the papacy as an Antichrist institution, which despite the polemic stance, comes out in a rather confusing manner.…”
Section: * * *mentioning
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…One should rather take into account an interpretation of apocalypticism, and apocalyptic exegesis in particular, as a largely self-referential discourse instead of a mere discourse of crisis and not overstate the practical consequences of apocalyptic interpretations. 111 The lack of exegetic consistency and the at times contradictory historical interpretations, a feature of Lutheran commentaries as well, fit into this understanding of apocalyptic exegesis. 112 This becomes evident in the treatment of the papacy as an Antichrist institution, which despite the polemic stance, comes out in a rather confusing manner.…”
Section: * * *mentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Loukaris says that he received Arminius ' Disputationes publicae from Wtenbogaert. 35 UBL, Bibliotheca Publica Latina [= BPL] 26B, f. Legrand,Βibliographie hellénique,IV, (n. [98][99][100][101][102][103][104][105][106][107][108][109][110][111]; M. I. Manousakas, 'Αὐτόγραφο γράμμα (1617) τοῦ Κυρίλλου Λουκάρεως στὸν Ὁλλανδὸ λόγιο David de Wilhem ', Μεσαιωνικὰ καὶ Νέα Ἑλληνικά 1 (1984) .…”
Section: 'A Friend To the Reformed Religion'unclassified
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…42 It would be translated into German and published two years later, and this edition would become, as Matthias Pohlig has observed, a standard historical text for the Lutherans. 43 An even more important source, at least for shaping Protestant perceptions of Gregory VII, was the Annals of Lampert of Hersfeld, which provided a very detailed account of the reign of Henry IV down to the year 1077. Although the Annals were not unknown, relatively few manuscript copies were made during the Middle Ages.…”
Section: IIImentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lutheran accounts of Gregory VII in the later sixteenth and early seventeenth centuries also tended, while insisting on his moral depravity, to emphasize that Gregory was a tyrant who sought to supplant imperial rule. 125 In England, the theme of papal aggression against the monarch remained, but in the seventeenth century it began to lose urgency. The fear now was that the Stuarts were either under the influence of Catholic courtiers or, worse yet, were Catholics themselves.…”
Section: VImentioning
confidence: 99%