Zygomatic Arch Reduction and Malarplasty with Multiple Osteotomies: Its Geometric Considerations

Ma, Fushun; Tang, Shengjian

doi:10.1007/s00266-014-0405-4

Cited by 13 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 23 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…As in (Fig. 5-C), a line extended from the anterior root to the posterior root of the ZA in the 3DCT represents the chord of the arch and the distance from most laterally protruding point to the chord is the height of the arch (HOA) (23). The HOA was measured and compared postoperatively between affected side and normal side in both groups to reflect the degree of zygomatic arch reduction.…”

Section: Assessment Of Zygomatic Arch Reductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Ultrasound Guided Closed Reduction Versus Open Reduction of Zygomatic Arch in Zygomaticomaxillary Fractures

Amer

Sharara

Mohamed

et al. 2020

Alexandria Dental Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

INTRODUCTION: trauma of the zygomaticomaxillary complex (ZMC) has functional and aesthetic consequences. Management of ZMC fractures is considered one of the most debatable issues regarding classification, diagnosis and surgical technique.Precise management of the ZMC fractures needs accurate diagnosis, accessible exposure, and precise rigid fixation OBJECTIVES: To compare between ultrasound guided closed reduction and open reduction of zygomatic arch in cases of ZMC fracture. MATERIALS AND METHODS:This study was conducted on a sample of twenty patients who had fracture repair of ZMC. Ten of them (study group) were treated via direct peri-orbital approach with the use of intra-operative ultrasound to guide zygomatic arch reduction. While the other ten patients (control group) via coronal approach with open reduction of zygomatic arch. Postoperative patient evaluation was performed with specific attention paid towards zygomatic arch reduction, nerve function, wound healing, and postoperative ocular complications. RESULTS: Radiographic follow up showed no statistical significant difference between normal side and reduced side of zygomatic arch which reflect satisfactory arch reduction among both groups. CONCLUSION: Ultrasonography is an effective method for guiding zygomatic arch reduction with other minimal incisions in cases of ZMC fracture. On the other hand, coronal incisions have advantages of giving excellent access to ZMC fracture with direct reduction of zygomatic arch but with considerable disadvantages.

show abstract

Section: Assessment Of Zygomatic Arch Reductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Ultrasound Guided Closed Reduction Versus Open Reduction of Zygomatic Arch in Zygomaticomaxillary Fractures

Amer

Sharara

Mohamed

et al. 2020

Alexandria Dental Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Liposuction of the Zygomatic Arch Area: A Novel Concept to Improve the Midface Contour

Yang

Wang

et al. 2022

Aesth Plast Surg

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Complications among Various Reduction Malarplasty

Zhang

Liu

et al. 2022

Aesth Plast Surg

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Zygomatic Arch Reduction and Malarplasty with Multiple Osteotomies: Its Geometric Considerations

Abstract: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.

Cited by 13 publications

References 23 publications

Ultrasound Guided Closed Reduction Versus Open Reduction of Zygomatic Arch in Zygomaticomaxillary Fractures

Ultrasound Guided Closed Reduction Versus Open Reduction of Zygomatic Arch in Zygomaticomaxillary Fractures

Liposuction of the Zygomatic Arch Area: A Novel Concept to Improve the Midface Contour

A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Complications among Various Reduction Malarplasty

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About