2000
DOI: 10.1375/136905200320565409
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Zygosity diagnosis in young twins by parental report

Abstract: Thi s study r epor ts on zygosi ty deter mi nati on i n tw i ns of chi l dhood age. Par ents r esponded to questionnaire items dealing with twin similarity in physical characteristics and frequency of mi stak i ng one tw i n for another by par ents, r el ati ves and str anger s. The accur acy of zygosi ty di agnosi s w as eval uated acr oss tw i ns aged 6, 8, and 10 and acr oss par ents. I n addi ti on, i t w as exami ned w hether the use of mul ti pl e r ater s and the use of l ongi tudi nal data l ead to an … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
146
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 149 publications
(151 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
5
146
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, for convenience, assessing the extent to which co-twins look like each other using questionnaires is one of the most widely used methods for zygosity classification, especially in large sample studies like ours (Gao et al, 2006;Jackson et al, 2001). Many twin studies have shown that questionnaire-based zygosity diagnosis can achieve accuracy of around 93% (Rietveld et al, 2000).…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, for convenience, assessing the extent to which co-twins look like each other using questionnaires is one of the most widely used methods for zygosity classification, especially in large sample studies like ours (Gao et al, 2006;Jackson et al, 2001). Many twin studies have shown that questionnaire-based zygosity diagnosis can achieve accuracy of around 93% (Rietveld et al, 2000).…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…These items allow accurate determination of zygosity in 93% of the same-sex twin pairs (Rietveld et al, 2000).…”
Section: Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We excluded data for several reasons: congenital anomalies (2 twins); severe growth retardation (1 sibling); non-Dutch parents (3 twin pairs); pregnancy or illness (weight data of 1 twin and 2 siblings); unavailability of weight and BMI reference values (28 siblings); unavailability of arm span reference values (7 twins and 23 siblings). Zygosity of same-sex twin pairs (145 pairs) was determined on the basis of DNA polymorphisms (140 pairs), blood group polymorphisms (4 pairs), or questionnaire items on similarity 21 (1 pair). The sample comprised 30 monozygotic male, 33 dizygotic male, 44 monozygotic female, 38 dizygotic female, and 39 dizygotic opposite sex twin pairs and 97 siblings (45% males and 55% females).…”
Section: Bmimentioning
confidence: 99%