2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.humpath.2006.08.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

α-methylacyl-CoA racemase (P504S)/34βE12/p63 triple cocktail stain in prostatic adenocarcinoma after hormonal therapy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The occasional absence of basal cells in partial atrophy and adenosis along with outpouching of highgrade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (HPIN) may yield false-negative results with basal cell markers (high-molecular weight keratin and p63) [6,7]. AMACR reactivity is absent in approximately 25% of prostate cancers [7,8] and 36% of HPIN [9]. Other limitations of AMACR include cytoplasmic staining, which can be ambiguous, and the lack of increased staining intensity with increasing Gleason pattern [5,6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The occasional absence of basal cells in partial atrophy and adenosis along with outpouching of highgrade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (HPIN) may yield false-negative results with basal cell markers (high-molecular weight keratin and p63) [6,7]. AMACR reactivity is absent in approximately 25% of prostate cancers [7,8] and 36% of HPIN [9]. Other limitations of AMACR include cytoplasmic staining, which can be ambiguous, and the lack of increased staining intensity with increasing Gleason pattern [5,6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…23 immune reaction. New multiplexing techniques that combine tyramide-signal amplification and multispectral imaging are being developed and permit complex analyses of the spatial interactions between tumors and many classes of immune cells, eg, see Stack et al 3 Prostate cancer diagnostics could also benefit from clinically directed multiplexing, as core biopsies could be routinely examined using antibodies defining basal and luminal cells and cells with upregulated racemase, 37,38 as well as antibody panels that might survey protein products of the Genomic Health prostate panel of 17 genes that has been developed to stratify patients into progression-risk categories. 39 It is difficult to get an accurate evaluation of the falsepositive and false-negative rates of prostate core biopsies, but it is clear that the use of combined 3-antibody IHC has become much more frequent and has probably decreased these rates.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When we reviewed prostate specimens obtained through fine needle biopsy, we noted especial difficulties in interpreting minute foci of atypical acini (atypical hyperplasia (AHP) vs atypical small acinar proliferation (ASAP) vs welldifferentiated prostate adenocarcinoma (PCA) (Montironi EU 2006) [43], and of atypia in neoplastic prostate glands after hormonal or radiotherapy (Sung HP 2007) [44]. The main causes of discordance in the prostate specimens obtained through TURP were problems in assessing the histological grade of intraepithelial prostatic neoplasia (PIN) (low-grade vs high-grade PIN; high-grade PIN vs microinvasive PCA), and in assessing the Gleason score histologic grading (Montironi NCPU 2007) [45] (Montironi JCP 2007) [46].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%