2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.amc.2011.11.083
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

α Regularization of the POD-Galerkin dynamical systems of the Kuramoto–Sivashinsky equation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
68
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
68
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Overall, the AD-ROM results are similar to those for the EV-ROMs in [14] and Reg-ROMs in [37,38]: For example, the accuracy of the AD-ROM energy spectrum (see Fig. 1 in this paper) is similar to the accuracy of the energy spectra of the best EV-ROMs (see Fig.…”
Section: Comparison With Other Romssupporting
confidence: 64%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Overall, the AD-ROM results are similar to those for the EV-ROMs in [14] and Reg-ROMs in [37,38]: For example, the accuracy of the AD-ROM energy spectrum (see Fig. 1 in this paper) is similar to the accuracy of the energy spectra of the best EV-ROMs (see Fig.…”
Section: Comparison With Other Romssupporting
confidence: 64%
“…Thus, while needed, this comparison is beyond the scope of this paper. We will, however, present next a brief qualitative comparison of the AD-ROM with two other representative classes of ROMs: the EV-ROMs [3,8,14] and the Reg-ROMs [37,38]. Since both the test problem and the statistics used in [14,38] are identical to those used in this paper, our qualitative comparison is meaningful.…”
Section: Comparison With Other Romsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, the use of POD/Galerkin methods raises numerical instability and non-linearity inefficiency problems [11,12,13,14]. Several methods have been presented to improve the numerical stability of ROMs, such as calibration [15,16], Fourier expansion [17], regularisation [18] and Petrov−Galerkin methods [2,19]. In order to enhance the nonlinear efficiency, various methods have been proposed, including empirical interpolation method (EIM) [20], the discrete version of EIM (DEIM) [14], quadratic expansion method [21,22], a hybrid of DEIM and quadratic expansion (residual DEIM) method [23], a Petrov−Galerkin projection method [15], and Gauss-Newton with approximated tensors (GNAT) method [24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%