2000
DOI: 10.1515/ijnsns.2000.1.4.337
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Α Study on Radial Basis Function and Quasi-Monte Carlo Methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, the numerical experiments showed that the BKM could avoid the curse of dimensionality in the solution of the 3D problem. This attractive advantage is endorsed by the theoretical analysis and experimental ÿndings that the use of higher order smooth radial basis functions can o set the dimensional a ect [16,25,26].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, the numerical experiments showed that the BKM could avoid the curse of dimensionality in the solution of the 3D problem. This attractive advantage is endorsed by the theoretical analysis and experimental ÿndings that the use of higher order smooth radial basis functions can o set the dimensional a ect [16,25,26].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can be observed from the tables that the BKM worked equally well for this 3D problem as in the previous 2D cases. Based on some numerical experiments and theoretical analysis concerning the dimensional e ect on the error bounds of the RBF interpolation, Chen and He [25] conjectured that the RBF-based numerical scheme may circumvent the curse of dimensionality like the Monte Carlo method. To be more precise, the computational e ort in using the RBF on solving higher-dimensional problems only grows linearly instead of exponentially.…”
Section: A 3d Homogeneous Helmholtz Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first method adopts cubic splines [17][18][19][20][21][22][23]. The second one interpolates with radial basis functions [24][25][26][27][28][29][30]. Finally, the third method is an ad hoc neuronal network: the multilayer perceptron (MLP) [31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40], expecting in this case that fitting weighed and biased algorithms would be compatible with a simple calculation based on metaheuristic techniques such as simulated annealing (SA) or particle swarm optimization (PSO), [41].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If one views a PDE from a numerical Green's function formulation, low-discrepancy sequences are one approach to numerically computing a solution in complex domains. These methods have been used in the solution of integral equations [6,7], and more recently, in the solution of PDE's [7]. The basic premise is that a good estimate of the solution may be obtained with relatively few samples, i.e., a sparse mesh.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%