2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2003.07.035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

α4β2 nACh Receptor pharmacophore models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
36
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Binding Mode of Compound 1-Compound 1 defines the binding mode of the unsubstituted 1-(pyridin-3-yl)-1,4-diazepane scaffold, which is in general agreement with the classical nicotinic pharmacophore (60). As shown in Fig.…”
Section: Evaluation Of Ls-achbp As Model System For Nachr ␣4␤2supporting
confidence: 72%
“…Binding Mode of Compound 1-Compound 1 defines the binding mode of the unsubstituted 1-(pyridin-3-yl)-1,4-diazepane scaffold, which is in general agreement with the classical nicotinic pharmacophore (60). As shown in Fig.…”
Section: Evaluation Of Ls-achbp As Model System For Nachr ␣4␤2supporting
confidence: 72%
“…However, ligands are known for which the pharmacophoric distance is higher even than that found for nicotine and water: for instance (Chart 3), in 4-(3'-hydroxyphenyl)-1,1-dimethylpiperazinium iodide (the phenol analogue of DMPP), the distance between the H-bond forming group and the cationic nitrogen is 7.5 Å, while for 4-(3-pyridyl)but-3-yn-1-amines the low energy conformers have distances higher than 8 Å. 59 Both compounds are reported to bind with nanomolar affinity to the receptor. 50,60 So it can be suggested that ligands dock into the active site in a way that allows them to interact with different residues according to their own distance between the pharmacophoric points.…”
mentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Compounds 1 and 6 (as well as their methiodides 4 and 7) show a distance between the Hbond acceptor aromatic nitrogen and the cationic nitrogen of 6.5-6.6 Å, therefore higher than that proposed by pharmacophoric models, [47][48][49] but in the same range as that obtained considering the additional water molecule which connects the nicotine pyridyl nitrogen and the protein in the crystal structure of the complex between AChBP and nicotine. The possible presence of a water molecule is the basis of the "water-extension concept", 59 which suggests that a short ligand such as nicotine (N-N distance 4.8 Å) can be transformed into a longer ligand whose distance between the cationic nitrogen and the H-bond forming group (pyridyl nitrogen or water oxigen) is higher (6.7 Å in the crystal structure); this would explain the wide range of the proposed pharmacophoric distances. In addition, the water molecule could allow the interaction of the protein with a ligand having an H-bond acceptor as well as donor group in the suitable position.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4.8 . With the coming out of epibatidine as a high-affinity nicotinic agonist, Glennon et al proposed a new model indicating an optimal d of 5.1 -5.5 [31], which was further extended by Abreo et al to 6.1 [32], but it has not been agreed upon a precise nicotine pharmacophore by the medicinal chemists [33].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%