2008
DOI: 10.1007/s10773-007-9647-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

η-Weak-Pseudo-Hermiticity Generators and Radially Symmetric Hamiltonians

Abstract: A class η-weak-pseudo-Hermiticity generators for spherically symmetric nonHermitian Hamiltonians are presented. An operators-based procedure is introduced so that the results for the 1D Schrödinger Hamiltonian may very well be reproduced. A generalization beyond the nodeless states is proposed. Our illustrative examples include η-weakpseudo-Hermiticity generators for the non-Hermitian weakly perturbed 1D and radial oscillators, and the non-Hermitian perturbed radial Coulomb.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

4
41
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
4
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[23] as a position-dependent mass system. It is worth mentioning other interests in position-dependent mass systems, such as, in PT -symmetric quantum mechanics [25][26][27], supersymmetric quantum mechanics [28][29][30] and relativistic quantum mechanics [31][32][33][34][35][36][37].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[23] as a position-dependent mass system. It is worth mentioning other interests in position-dependent mass systems, such as, in PT -symmetric quantum mechanics [25][26][27], supersymmetric quantum mechanics [28][29][30] and relativistic quantum mechanics [31][32][33][34][35][36][37].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this work, we present (in section 2) a d-dimensional recipe for η-pseudoHermiticity generators for a class of non-Hermitian Hamiltonians with positiondependent masses, M (r) = m • m (r) . An immediate recovery of our generalized η-pseudo-Hermiticity generators for Hamiltonians with radial symmetry [14] is obvious through the substitution m (r) = 1. Our illustrative examples are given in section 3.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In a broader class (where PT -symmetric Hamiltonians constitute a subclass among others) of non-Hermitian pseudo-Hermitian Hamiltonians [8][9][10][11][12][13][14] (a generalization of PT -symmetry, therefore), it is concreted that the eigenvalues of a pseudo-Hermitian Hamiltonian H are either real or come in complex-conjugate pairs. In this case, a Hamiltonian H is pseudo-Hermitian if it obeys the similarity transformation:…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations