2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.knosys.2011.07.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

μ-SATPLAN: Multi-agent planning as satisfiability

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This explains also why, as shown in the following, we are able to achieve much higher scalability than state-of-the-art multiagent plan synthesis algorithms, (e.g., Dimopoulos et al, 2012;Nissim et al, 2010;Torreno et al, 2012). The algorithms exploit "locality" in different ways in order to be able to plan for parts of a multiagent planning problem while temporarily ignoring others, for example, by considering noninteracting subplans in isolation from each other.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…This explains also why, as shown in the following, we are able to achieve much higher scalability than state-of-the-art multiagent plan synthesis algorithms, (e.g., Dimopoulos et al, 2012;Nissim et al, 2010;Torreno et al, 2012). The algorithms exploit "locality" in different ways in order to be able to plan for parts of a multiagent planning problem while temporarily ignoring others, for example, by considering noninteracting subplans in isolation from each other.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Brafman and Domshlak (2008) applied constraint satisfaction and factored planning to produce plans for multi-agent problems, which was extended to use distributed constraint satisfaction solvers (Nissim et al, 2010). Another satisfiability based planner, µ-SATPLAN extended SATPLAN to multi-agent planning for two distinct classes of problems: multi-agent coordinated actions and multi-agent assistance actions (Dimopoulos et al, 2012).…”
Section: Ii35 Multi-agentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors in [15] propose an approach to coordinate the course of agents' actions operating in the same environment in two different settings: when agents by themselves are able to achieve their individual goals and when agents need other agents to reach their individual goals. The authors extend the classical SATPLAN planner to deal with the problem of multi-agent planning by handling negative (i.e., harmful) and positive interactions in order to finally discover consistent plans for multiple agents.…”
Section: Practical and Industrial Settingsmentioning
confidence: 99%