1995
DOI: 10.1103/physrevc.52.1203
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

πNNcoupling constants fromNNelastic data between 210 and 800 MeV

Abstract: High partial waves for pp and np elastic scattering are examined critically from 210 to 800 MeV. Non-OPE contributions are compared with predictions from theory. There are some discrepancies, but sufficient agreement that values of the πNN coupling constants g 2 0 for π 0 exchange and g 2 c for charged π exchange can be derived. Results are g 2 0 = 13.91 ± 0.13 ± 0.07 and g 2 c = 13.69 ± 0.15 ± 0.24, where the first error is statistical and the second is an estimate of the likely systematic error, arising most… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

6
25
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
6
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These deviations are larger than the differences expected from the neutron energy changes among the various experiments. As the backangle rise is particularly influential in pole extrapolations used [8,12] to extract the pion-nucleon-nucleon coupling constant, the present data strongly favor the value (f 2 c = 0.0748 ± 0.0003) given by the Nijmegen [6] and other [5] partial-wave analyses.…”
supporting
confidence: 66%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These deviations are larger than the differences expected from the neutron energy changes among the various experiments. As the backangle rise is particularly influential in pole extrapolations used [8,12] to extract the pion-nucleon-nucleon coupling constant, the present data strongly favor the value (f 2 c = 0.0748 ± 0.0003) given by the Nijmegen [6] and other [5] partial-wave analyses.…”
supporting
confidence: 66%
“…The neutron-proton elastic scattering database at intermediate energies is plagued by experimental inconsistencies and cross section normalization difficulties [1,2,3]. These problems have led the most sophisticated partial wave analyses (PWA) of the data [4,5,6] to ignore the majority (including the most recent) of measured cross sections, while the literature is filled with heated debates over experimental and theoretical methods [7,8], including proposed radical "doctoring" (angledependent renormalization) to "salvage" allegedly flawed data [9]. Meanwhile, an empirical evaluation of a fundamental parameter of meson-exchange theories of the nuclear force -the charged πNN coupling constant, f 2 c -hangs in the balance [8].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The influence of these observables on the determination of g 2 p has also been established empirically [13] through an extensive study of local (single-energy) phase shift analyses. Yet the current NN database [14] contains few data for D NN 0 in this energy and angle range, and none for D LL 0 between 150 and 400 MeV.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based upon precise π ± p data in the 100-310 MeV range and applying fixed-t dispersion relations, they obtained the value g 2 π ± /4π = 13.96 ± 0.25 (equivalent to f 2 π ± = 0.0771 ± 0.0014) [15]. From the analysis of N N elastic data between 210 and 800 MeV, Bugg and Machleidt [16] have deduced g 2 π ± /4π = 13.69 ± 0.39 and g 2 π 0 /4π = 13.94 ± 0.24. Thus, it may appear that recent determinations show a consistent trend towards a lower value for g π with no indication for substantial charge dependence.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%