Wechselwirkung Von Π-Elektronensystemen Mit Metallhalogeniden 1973
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-48186-4_4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

π-Komplexe

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 149 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, a closer look at the Sb···C aryl,PNP distances revealed a weak cation–anion interaction, as manifested by a shortened Sb···C aryl,PNP distance [ d (Sb1···C58) = 3.677(4) Å, compared to ∑ r van der Waals = 3.76 Å], which can be understood as a weak Menshutkin-type interaction (Figure ). …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, a closer look at the Sb···C aryl,PNP distances revealed a weak cation–anion interaction, as manifested by a shortened Sb···C aryl,PNP distance [ d (Sb1···C58) = 3.677(4) Å, compared to ∑ r van der Waals = 3.76 Å], which can be understood as a weak Menshutkin-type interaction (Figure ). …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While each nitrogen adopts a trigonal-pyramidal structure, the coordination environment around each bismuth is best described as distorted pseudotrigonal bipyramidal, with the lone pair occupying the equatorial position. A closer look at the structure reveals Menshutkin-type interactions , for each bismuth center, each with one benzene molecule in an η 6 fashion [Figure ; Bi–C distances between 3.35 and 3.57 Å; cf. ∑ r VdW (C–Bi) = 3.77 Å] .…”
Section: Structure and Bondingmentioning
confidence: 99%