1992
DOI: 10.1016/0022-328x(92)85065-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

σ,-Ferrocenyl-komplexe des rutheniums

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

1993
1993
1997
1997

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, the average Ru−C σ bond distance (2.09 Å) is similar to those reported for other ruthenium C sp 2 single bonds 12,19d and is significantly larger than those in ruthenium carbenes (∼1.8−1.9 A) much further downfield than the corresponding signal observed for 2 , which exhibits a chemical shift (96.8 ppm) that is in agreement with model systems …”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 82%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Indeed, the average Ru−C σ bond distance (2.09 Å) is similar to those reported for other ruthenium C sp 2 single bonds 12,19d and is significantly larger than those in ruthenium carbenes (∼1.8−1.9 A) much further downfield than the corresponding signal observed for 2 , which exhibits a chemical shift (96.8 ppm) that is in agreement with model systems …”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 82%
“…While, in the absence of pertinent bond strength data, simple initial homolytic cleavage of a Ru−C σ bond followed by a rapid rearrangement to 16 and ring closure (“biradical” mechanism) cannot be ruled out, it appears unlikely on consideration of literature data which suggest a DH °(Ru−C sp 2 ) closer to 40 kcal mol -1 or more. , Moreover, a crude thermochemical estimate of bond strengths, assuming DH °(Ru−C sp 2 ) = 30 kcal mol -1 for 2 (from the above Δ H ⧧ for 2 → 1 ), DH °(Ru−Ru) ≈ 35 kcal mol -1 {a value extrapolated for [(η 5 -C 5 H 5 )Ru(CO) 2 ] 2 from measured data for related (CpM) 2 complexes}, and the enthalpy change ( 2 → 1 ) ∼ −30 kcal mol -1 (vide supra), would provide a Cp−Cp bond strength of ∼55 kcal mol -1 , intuitively unreasonably low . On the other hand, the positive and, except for 15 , large Δ S ⧧ values indicate substantial disorder in the transition state, certainly consistent with a biradical pathway …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Treatment of [RuCl(Fc)(CO)(r|-C 6 Me 6 )] with the appropriate organolithium reagent gives [Ru(R)(Fc)(CO)(Ti-C 6 Me 6 )] (R = Bu n , p-Tol). 167 The relationship between a-alkyls and alkene complexes in (arene)osmium chemistry is particularly close. Treatment of [OsMe 2 (CO)(r|-arene)] with [Ph 3 C]PF 6 gives the hydrido(ethene) complex [OsH(r|-C 2 H 4 )(CO)(r|-arene)]PF 6 (arene = C 6 H 6 , C 6 H 3 Me 3 ); this reaction probably proceeds by initial hydride abstraction from one of the methyl groups, migration of the other methyl group to the Os=CH 2 moiety thus formed, and (3- …”
Section: Hydrides and Alkyls Containing No Other Rc-acceptor Ligandsmentioning
confidence: 98%