2010
DOI: 10.1063/1.3542003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

φ-meson production and the in-medium φ-width in proton-nucleus collisions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results are compared to the ANKE data in figure 8. We can see that the shape of the momentum dependent cross section is reproduced rather well, as well or even better than other model results which include a f meson modified in medium cross section [49][50][51]. The overall magnitude is underpredicted for the most heavy nuclear targets, while the f production cross section on the lightest carbon nuclei is best described by our model.…”
Section: Nuclear Absorption Of the Fsupporting
confidence: 65%
“…The results are compared to the ANKE data in figure 8. We can see that the shape of the momentum dependent cross section is reproduced rather well, as well or even better than other model results which include a f meson modified in medium cross section [49][50][51]. The overall magnitude is underpredicted for the most heavy nuclear targets, while the f production cross section on the lightest carbon nuclei is best described by our model.…”
Section: Nuclear Absorption Of the Fsupporting
confidence: 65%
“…The relative normalization uncertainty, which is described in detail in Refs. [25,29], is about 4%-6%, depending on the target nucleus.…”
Section: Experiments and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although only used here for efficiency studies, forward-going charged particles could also be measured in coincidence. The positively charged kaon was first selected using a dedicated detection system that can identify a K + against a pion and/or proton background that is 10 5 times more intense [29,31,32]. The coincident K − was subsequently identified from the time-of-flight difference between the stop counters in the negative and positive detector systems.…”
Section: Experiments and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation