Protein Engineering Handbook 2008
DOI: 10.1002/9783527634026.ch4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Φ‐Value Analysis of Protein Folding Transition States

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 87 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Conservative point mutations were used that should not significantly alter the structure of D (26). Thus, significant free energy changes most likely report on changes in the relative stability of N and I (26,49).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conservative point mutations were used that should not significantly alter the structure of D (26). Thus, significant free energy changes most likely report on changes in the relative stability of N and I (26,49).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach has been successfully used in protein folding studies, and the basic idea is to compare changes in respectively binding-and activation energy. Principles and practices of the approach have been lucidly discussed elsewhere (58,59), and will not be reiterated here, except for some key aspects of the current application, which are sketched out in Fig. 5.…”
Section: Trp-variants and φ-Factor Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We determined whether variations in the ionic strength or pH modulated the stability of SAP L31W (Fig. 4 A and B, filled circles) in order to identify the optimal conditions for in vitro studies of protein folding reactions ( Ferguson and Fersht, 2008 ). Ideally, such studies should be performed under conditions where the protein stability is independent of small changes in pH, so that changes in pH with temperature (arising from non-zero ionisation enthalpies for buffers) or batch-to-batch variation in reagents have negligible effects.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%