Гражданское Участие: Особенности Дискурса И Тенденции Реального Развития

Никовская, Лариса Игоревна; Skalaban, Irina A.

doi:10.17976/jpps/2017.06.04

Cited by 12 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…R. Putnam [4]; Nikovskaya L.I., Skalaban I.A. [5] note the role of informal connections of support, interpersonal trust, and volunteering. Other scholars stress the importance of historical experience (for example, "successful practices of interaction between local communities and government bodies" [6]); as well as the level of intellectual, scientific and educational resources [7] and competences.…”

Section: A the Concept And Methodology Of Interaction Culture Forminmentioning

confidence: 99%

Local communities’ interaction culture through involving in Ufa agglomeration development

Borodina¹,

Kulikov²,

Lavrenyuk³

2019

Proceedings of the 1st International Scientific Practical Conference "The Individual and Society in the Modern Geopolitical Env

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In this article, we outline the basic concepts and current practices of forming a culture of local community interaction through involvement in the strategic development of the Ufa agglomeration. In particular, we specify and characterize the category "local communities of agglomeration" which defines a concept of interactive culture between local communities in the context of a socio-cultural approach. The research aims to describe the process of the Ufa agglomeration strategic development with the participation of local communities; reviewing local community involvement technologies in the strategic development of agglomerations. We analyze the practices of involving local communities in the strategic development of the Ufa agglomeration, draw conclusions and demonstrate actual practices of working with local communities in the city of Ufa and adjacent territories in the process of interactive culture created by socioeconomic development.

show abstract

Section: A the Concept And Methodology Of Interaction Culture Forminmentioning

confidence: 99%

Local communities’ interaction culture through involving in Ufa agglomeration development

Borodina¹,

Kulikov²,

Lavrenyuk³

2019

Proceedings of the 1st International Scientific Practical Conference "The Individual and Society in the Modern Geopolitical Env

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Социальное участие -это коллективная деятельность, которая осуществляется в рамках повседневной жизни и направлена на удовлетворение общественного интереса. Она локализуется на горизонтальном уровне, более отвечая практике коллективной взаимопомощи и кооперации [7]. В педагогических исследованиях разграничивают четыре формы молодёжного участия: гражданское участие, участие в межгрупповом диалоге и социально-политическом развитии, а также участие молодёжи в деятельности местных НКО [8].…”

Section: аннотация статья подготовлена по материалам международного unclassified

Social Participation of the Russian and Armenian Students in the Socio-Cultural Development of Cities

Певная

Shuklina

Tarasova

et al. 2020

Vysš. obraz. Ross. (Print)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The article was prepared on the basis of an international comparative study – a sociological survey of students from regional universities from 37 cities in the Sverdlovsk region of the Russian Federation and 20 settlements of the Shirak region in the Republic of Armenia (targeted sample, No. = 715). The authors explore the potential for social participation of students from countries with a common political background of post-socialism and cardinal differences in the cultural and historical heritage of urban spaces.The purpose of this article is to determine the potential for social participation of students of regional universities in Russia and Armenia and the subjective factors that determine their activity in the development of cities. The article analyzes the experience of volunteering, as well as the willingness of students to different types of constructive social participation in urban development. To identify factors that activate the social participation of students, a discriminant analysis has been used. Discriminant models were constructed dividing groups of students from different countries with a high and low degree of readiness for social participation, as well as into groups with and without volunteering experience. The authors argue that Russia and Armenia are characterized by an identical structure of student involvement in volunteer activities, but the level of students’ readiness for social participation in urban development in the countries under consideration is different. For Armenian students, not only the willingness for social participation is higher, but also the practices themselves are more associated with active socio-cultural activities in the urban space. Two factors that determine the experience of real participation in the socio-cultural development of cities are characteristic of both Russian and Armenian students. The real experience of volunteering is more likely to be acquired by those students who are motivated to receive information about the culture and history of their cities, as well as the ability to see and identify significant cultural and historical objects where they live and study. In the Russian scenario, the importance of the city, the need for its development increases for students if they, being armed with certain knowledge about its culture and history, consider that the city is an interesting object (including a tourist one) for promotion. For Armenian students, knowledge of the culture and history of their place of birth is a basic factor that shapes their interest in further exploring their cities, the desire to make them better.

show abstract

Patriotic Education of Students at Moscow State University of Technologies and Management named after K.G. Razumovsky (First Cossack University)

Kashchenko¹,

Юлина²,

Yulina

2018

Scientific Research and Development. Socio-Humanitarian Research and Technology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The authors distinguish three levels of patriotic education: federal, subject (All-Moscow) and university. All three levels should be provided not by formalized work "from the top down", but by interactive, civic, participatory, volunteer activities, taking into account the specifics of the current generation, by involving students in the implementation of federal and Moscow programs, through the development of student government, the activation of various areas of student life, the formation feelings of pride for their University.

show abstract

Гражданское Участие: Особенности Дискурса И Тенденции Реального Развития

Cited by 12 publications

References 0 publications

Local communities’ interaction culture through involving in Ufa agglomeration development

Local communities’ interaction culture through involving in Ufa agglomeration development

Social Participation of the Russian and Armenian Students in the Socio-Cultural Development of Cities

Patriotic Education of Students at Moscow State University of Technologies and Management named after K.G. Razumovsky (First Cossack University)

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About