Дополнительные Придаточные С Сослагательным Наклонением В Русском Языке

The Analogues of Tense Interpretation in Russian Embedded Clauses: Absolute vs. Relative Modality, Absolute vs. Relative Aspect

“…The embedded verb uxodit also denotes an unreal event. However, this irreality 3 [Brecht 1977] and [Dobrushina 2012] show that by inside the marker čtoby behaves as a part of word, and not an autonomous particle. At the same time, syntatically, by inside čtoby is a part of the subjunctive form because čtoby is only compatible with infinitives and l-forms.…”

“…The absolute modality is illustrated by (5). The subjunctive perestali (by) in the third clause is not introduced by the verb nastal (by) in the second one: the form perestali by does not mean that the situation in the third clause is more compared to the situation in the second clause.…”

“…If we consider their behavior in biclausal structures, we will find some other differences. [Dobrushina 2012] describes a special subjunctive subtype of Russian relative clauses. They are usually used when the relativization target refers to a non-specific entity that may not exist or, if it exists, the speaker cannot distinguish it from other similar objects: (10) Я ищу человека, который наладил бы мне компьютер.…”

“…This difference shows that the relative clause in Russian tends to mark the modal meanings in relative clauses more explicitly than in adjunct clauses. 5…”

“…The reason is that in (11), the general conditional context supposes the irreality. In this case, absolute tense use is facilitated and the subjunctive 5 Note that an alternative variant Я бы туда пришёл, когда позволила бы ситуация is possible, but it is not parallel to (10) where the main clause contains an indicative form.…”