2018
DOI: 10.22190/teme1801035c
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Испитивање Ставова Грађана О Пружању Помоћи Угроженим Људима И Волонтирању За Време Катастрофа

Abstract: The subject of quantitative research is to examine the factors influencing citizens' attitudes towards assisting vulnerable people and volunteering during natural disasters. In this paper, the authors examine the relationship between gender, age, level of education, marital status, employment, income level and perception of personal religiosity, and the attitudes to assisting vulnerable people and volunteering. Multiple-point random sampling was used to survey 2500 citizens in the area of 19 local communities … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 36 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…People that do replenish their emergency supplies report wanting to ensure they have safe drinking water and food (Page et al 2008;Kapucu 2008;Becker et al 2012). There are groups within any community that may require additional support and assistance following an earthquake (Tanida 1996;Matsuda and Okada 2006;WHO 2008;Cvetković, Milašinović and Lazić 2018). Often, however, marginal groups are not considered in disaster planning (Heller et al 2005;Zorn 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…People that do replenish their emergency supplies report wanting to ensure they have safe drinking water and food (Page et al 2008;Kapucu 2008;Becker et al 2012). There are groups within any community that may require additional support and assistance following an earthquake (Tanida 1996;Matsuda and Okada 2006;WHO 2008;Cvetković, Milašinović and Lazić 2018). Often, however, marginal groups are not considered in disaster planning (Heller et al 2005;Zorn 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%