Почему Буду?

Swan, Oscar E.

doi:10.1007/s11185-012-9095-1

Cited by 3 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 6 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…At this stage of the argument, all that is required is that we have two types of verb, while in the canonical situation we would have one; see further Rucart 2006 andPaster 2009:42, n. 17. For detailed discussion of another language with prefixing and suffixing stems, see Kim's (2010) phonological approach to Huave, and for the rise of different affixation patterns in Papuan languages, see Foley 2000:377. 17 For an account of how budu established itself in this role in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, see Swan 2012.…”

Section: 3mentioning

confidence: 99%

Morphosyntactic complexity: A typology of lexical splits

Corbett¹

2015

lan

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A key notion in understanding language is 'possible word (lexeme)'. While there are lexemes that are internally homogeneous and externally consistent, we find others with splits in their internal structure (morphological paradigm) and inconsistencies in their external behavior (syntactic requirements). I first explore the characteristics of the most straightforward lexemes, in order to establish a point in the theoretical space from which we can calibrate the real examples we find. I then schematize the interesting phenomena that deviate from this idealization, including suppletion, syncretism, deponency, and defectiveness. Next I analyze the different ways in which lexemes are 'split' by such phenomena. I set out a typology of possible splits, along four dimensions: splits that are (i) based on the composition/feature signature of the paradigm versus those based solely on morphological form; (ii) motivated (following a boundary motivated from outside the paradigm) versus purely morphology-internal ('morphomic'); (iii) regular (extending across the lexicon) versus irregular (lexically specified); (iv) externally relevant versus irrelevant: we expect splits to be internal to the lexeme, but some have external relevance (they require different syntactic behaviors).I identify instances of these four dimensions separately: they are orthogonal, and therefore not dependent on each other. Their interaction gives a substantial typology, and it proves to be surprisingly complete: the possibilities specified are all attested. The typology also allows for the unexpected patterns of behavior to overlap in particular lexemes, producing some remarkable examples. Such examples show that the notion 'possible word' is more challenging than many linguists have realized.*

show abstract

Section: 3mentioning

confidence: 99%

Morphosyntactic complexity: A typology of lexical splits

Corbett¹

2015

lan

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Middle Russian Future Periphrastic Constructions in the Light of Language Contacts

Penkova

2021

Scando-Slavica

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The use of donor oocytes for the treatment of infertile patients of late reproductive age: The state of the problem

Krasnopolskaya¹,

Aleksandrova²

2017

Ross. vestn. akush.-ginekol.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

В настоящее время проблема бесплодия является чрезвычайно актуальной почти во всех экономически развитых странах мира. Согласно данным современных источников литературы [1, 2], бесплодной оказывается каждая шестая семейная пара, желающая иметь детей, причем число бездетных пар продолжает увеличиваться. Так, до конца 90-х годов ХХ века данный показатель составлял 7-8%, а в 2011 г. он увеличился до 17%. В настоящее время распространенность бесплодия в разных регионах Российской Федерации составляет от 8 до 19%. Основными причинами женского бесплодия в 40-50% наблюдений становится трубно-перитонеальный фактор, в 15-30%различные эндокринные нарушения и в 20-30%-эндометриоз. Благодаря использованию медикаментозного и оперативного лечения довольно часто удается восстановить естественную фертильность. Однако у ряда пациенток успешное лечение бесплодия возможно только с применением методов вспомогательной репродукции. Идея использования метода экстракорпорального оплодотворения (ЭКО) с целью лечения женского бесплодия у ученых возникла еще в конце XVIII века [3, 4]. Первая успешная операция ЭКО была проведена в 1978 г. британскими учеными у пациентки с абсолютным трубным фактором бесплодия. Первым ребенком, рожденным в СССР с помощью ЭКО, проведенного в лаборатории Б.В. Леонова, стала девочка, которая появилась на свет в феврале 1986 г., а спу

show abstract

Почему Буду?

Cited by 3 publications

References 6 publications

Morphosyntactic complexity: A typology of lexical splits

Morphosyntactic complexity: A typology of lexical splits

Middle Russian Future Periphrastic Constructions in the Light of Language Contacts

The use of donor oocytes for the treatment of infertile patients of late reproductive age: The state of the problem

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About