2019
DOI: 10.4992/jjpsy.90.17342
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

身体運動の大きさが拡散的アイデア産出に与える効果

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, another selective effect of arm movements was suggested. In a recent study [39], participants who performed arm movements tracing out large circles generated more original ideas (i.e., originality) than those who traced out small ones, but the total number of generated ideas (i.e., fluency) was comparable between conditions, suggesting that the largeness or divergence represented by arm movements could selectively influence originality. Therefore, kinematic properties such as curvature and size may determine the aspect of divergent creative thinking that is affected.…”
Section: Plos Onementioning
confidence: 90%
“…Indeed, another selective effect of arm movements was suggested. In a recent study [39], participants who performed arm movements tracing out large circles generated more original ideas (i.e., originality) than those who traced out small ones, but the total number of generated ideas (i.e., fluency) was comparable between conditions, suggesting that the largeness or divergence represented by arm movements could selectively influence originality. Therefore, kinematic properties such as curvature and size may determine the aspect of divergent creative thinking that is affected.…”
Section: Plos Onementioning
confidence: 90%
“…According to the theoretical framework of embodied cognition, human cognitive processes are grounded in bodily interactions with the physical world (Wilson, 2002;Waller, 2014). Consistent with this framework, much research has demonstrated sensorimotor processes' role in a wide range of cognitive functions (e.g., Glenberg and Muto et al 10.3389/fnagi.2022.1025667 Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience 02 frontiersin.org Kaschak, 2002;Dijkstra et al, 2007;Muto et al, 2018;Nagai et al, 2019). In recent years, increasing attention has been paid to incorporating and validating the embodied cognition framework in aging research (for reviews, see Vallet, 2015;Costello and Bloesch, 2017;Kuehn et al, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…According to the theoretical framework of embodied cognition, human cognitive processes are grounded in bodily interactions with the physical world (Wilson, 2002;Waller, 2014). Consistent with this framework, much research has demonstrated sensorimotor processes' role in a wide range of cognitive functions (e.g., Glenberg and Kaschak, 2002;Dijkstra et al, 2007;Muto et al, 2018;Nagai et al, 2019). In recent years, increasing attention has been paid to incorporating and validating the embodied cognition framework in aging research (for reviews, see Vallet, 2015;Costello and Bloesch, 2017;Kuehn et al, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%