개발협력과 기후변화 대응의 통합적 접근방안: 페루 사례를 중심으로(Integrating Climate Change into the Implementation of Development Cooperation Policy)

Jung, Jiyoung; Song, Jihei; Kim, Jin-O; Hyun, Chaewon

doi:10.2139/ssrn.3700615

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The previous literature that looked at Japan's foreign policy tended to focus on Japan's major DRR efforts, policy strategies, and funding trends [23,25,26]. In the case of South Korea, most of the climate literature has examined the process of green growth or SDGs mainstreaming into Korea's development portfolios, but these studies did not make policy connections to DRR despite the shared goals between the field of green growth, climate change adaptation, and DRR [27][28][29]. To the best of the authors' knowledge, no research has been conducted that compares the two donors' policy rhetoric in relation to DRR aid with their behavior as carried out in this study.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Breaking the Negative Feedback Loop of Disaster, Conflict, and Fragility: Analyzing Development Aid by Japan and South Korea

Lee

Kwon

2022

Sustainability

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Disaster risk reduction (DRR) has become an important element of donor policy, because numerous governments have expressed their commitment to helping countries vulnerable to natural hazards by mainstreaming DRR into their development programs. Meanwhile, countries that are considered fragile, as well as conflict-affected states, have faced a high risk of disasters brought on by natural hazards. However, there has been little research that addresses the complex relationship between disasters, conflict, and fragility in the context of development cooperation. Against this backdrop, this study analyzed the determinants of DRR aid allocation from Japan and South Korea—two East Asian countries that have shown a strong commitment to disaster resilience and peacebuilding—to investigate whether they are responsive to countries experiencing the combined risks of disasters and conflicts and/or fragility. Despite the vulnerable countries being in the most need, the study found that both Japan and Korea’s aid allocation has not been influenced much by the concurrence of disasters and conflict. Rather, it has been more driven by the level of a country’s climate vulnerability than the level of a country’s fragility. This suggests that developing countries facing multiple risks and challenges are at a major disadvantage in terms of the responsiveness of donors toward their needs and vulnerability.

show abstract