Introduction
Diabetes distress (DD) is common and has considerable impacts on diabetes management. Unfortunately, DD is less discussed and frequently underestimated. This study evaluated the prevalence and predictors of DD in adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).
Methods
A cross-sectional study was conducted at several specialized endocrinology outpatient clinics in Bangladesh from July 2019 to June 2020; 259 adults with T2DM participated. Participants’ DD and depression were measured using the 17-item Diabetes Distress Scale (DDS-17) and 9-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9), respectively. DDS-17 scores ≥2 and PHQ-9 scores ≥10 were the cutoffs for DD and significant depression, respectively.
Results
The mean (±SD) age of the participants was 50.36 (±12.7) years, with the majority (54.8%) being male; their median (IQR) duration of diabetes was 6 (3–11) years. Among the study participants, 52.5% had DD (29.7% moderate and 22.8% high DD). The prevalence of emotional burden, physician-related distress, regimen-related distress, and interpersonal distress was 68.7, 28.6, 66, and 37.7%, respectively. Depression was present in 40.5%; 28.6% of the participants had DD and depression. The total DDS-17 score was positively correlated with the PHQ-9 score (r = 0.325, p < 0.001). Rural residence (OR 1.94), presence of any diabetic complication (OR 3.125), insulin use (OR 2.687), and presence of major depression (OR 4.753) were positive predictors of DD. In contrast, age ≥ 40 years at diabetes diagnosis (OR 0.047) and diabetes duration of > 10 years (OR 0.240) were negative predictors of DD (p < 0.05 in all instances).
Conclusions
The prevalence of DD in our setting is notably high; DD and depression frequently overlap. Screening for diabetes distress may be considered, especially in high-risk patients.
We recommend waiting for 1 minute 45 seconds (105 seconds) after the loss of eyelash reflex before attempting intravenous cannulation in pediatric patients induced with sevoflurane, oxygen, and nitrous oxide without any premedication.
Purpose: Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is associated with an increased risk of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), and the presence of T2DM tremendously drives NAFLD progression. The use of transient elastography (TE) for assessment of NAFLD has been increasing due to its high sensitivity and specificity. This study aimed to measure liver stiffness in patients with T2DM and ultrasonography (USG)-diagnosed NAFLD and assess the correlations between liver stiffness and other clinical and biochemical parameters. Patients and Methods: This cross-sectional study assessed 205 adult patients with T2DM and USG-diagnosed NAFLD who were being treated at a specialized endocrine private practice in Bangladesh. All subjects underwent TE for hepatic fibrosis assessment, which was performed using a FibroScan ® 402 device. A fibrosis score ≥9.7 kilopascals (kPa) was used to define advanced fibrosis (≥F3). Results: Out of 205 (65.9% female, mean age 45 ± 27 years, 67.3% obese) patients, the frequencies of Grade 1, Grade 2, and Grade 3 fatty liver on USG were 46.3%, 51.2%, and 2.4%, respectively. According to the TE results, 41 (20%) had advanced fibrosis (≥F3). Subjects with advanced fibrosis had a higher body mass index (BMI), higher levels of alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST), and higher frequencies of individuals with elevated ALT and AST and advanced fatty liver grades on USG. The fibrosis score (kPa) was strongly and positively correlated with age, BMI, waist circumference, obesity, serum ALT and AST levels, and the fatty liver grade in USG; the AST:ALT ratio did not correlate with kPa.
Conclusion:The data showed that 20% of the subjects with T2DM having NAFLD on USG exhibited advanced fibrosis, demonstrating the need for early diagnosis and treatment of NAFLD in T2DM. The use of TE with other serum markers can be helpful for the diagnosis of advanced fibrosis.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.