Explanations for the Late Bronze Age crisis and collapse in the eastern Mediterranean are legion: migrations, predations by external forces, political struggles within dominant polities or system collapse among them, inequalities between centers and peripheries, climatic change and natural disasters, disease/plague. There has never been any overarching explanation to account for all the changes within and beyond the eastern Mediterranean, some of which occurred at different times from the mid to late 13th throughout the 12th centuries B.C.E. The ambiguity of the evidence-material, textual, climatic, chronologicaland the differing contexts involved across the central-eastern Mediterranean make it difficult to disentangle background noise from boundary conditions and to distinguish cause from effect. Can we identify the protagonists of the crisis and related events? How useful are recent explanations that focus on climate and/or chronology in providing a better understanding of the crisis? This article reviews the current state of the archaeological and historical evidence and considers the coherence of climatic explanations and overprecise chronologies in attempting to place the "crisis" in context. There is no final solution: the human-induced Late Bronze Age "collapse" presents multiple material, social, and cultural realities that demand continuing, and collaborative, archaeological, historical, and scientific attention and interpretation. 1 introduction Over the years, the Late Bronze Age "crisis" or "collapse" in the eastern Mediterranean has presented archaeologists and ancient historians with endless fodder for consumption, consideration, and speculation. This horizon of change typically has assumed considerable historical significance-the end of a long-standing high-culture era of interregional connectivity followed by major reorientations, change, and decline-as evident from the titles of books like The Crisis Years or the recently published 1177 B.C.: The Year Civilization Collapsed. 2 Cline's 1177 B.C., like the present study, seeks to explain the complexities that brought an end to the Late Bronze Age in the eastern Mediterranean. Thus, there are inevitable overlaps between our work and his in the types and range of data presented, but not in the way they are presented, nor in the readership for whom they are intended. 3 The present study aims to 1 We thank Julia Gruhot for assistance converting references to AJA format, and Luke Sollars for preparing fig. 7. We hope that readers will join the discussion on AJA Online (www.ajaonline.org). 2 Ward and Joukowsky 1992; Cline 2014. 3 The precise dates (including the title) of Cline's volume are really best guesses from a limited set of viable radiocarbon dates, a few anchor points in documentary sources, and circular reasoning, all of which give his narrative an exactitude in sequences and correspondences too smoothly linked for comfort. His reading of the documentary record is commendable, but the discussion of "natural causes" is inadequate and, as ever, ...
Archaeologists who seek to examine people ' and 'postprocessual' (e.g. Shanks & Tilley 1987, 61-78; Meskell 1999, 8-36;Hodder 2000; Tarlow 2002, 26-7; Gosden 2004, 33-9; Kristiansen 2004, 83-5), archaeologists who want to open up windows onto the roles people played in past societies typically assume, consciously or unconsciously, the existence of individuals. Thomas (2004a, 147-8), however, challenges unqualified assumptions about the existence of individuals, at least in Europe prior to about 500 years ago: Past Practices: Rethinking Individuals and Agents in Archaeology A. Bernard Knapp & Peter van DommelenThe result [of recent work on agency] … has been to conflate agency with the actor … and thus to assume that evidence of agency is the same thing as evidence for individuals or subjects or selves. This confusion is an understandable one, and in archaeology its origins would seem to lie in the wholly necessary and laudable attempt to think about the concrete attributes of individuals in the past and their role in social and cultural change. (Moore 2000, 260)
This study takes as its point of departure recent discussions in sociology, anthropology, queer theory, and masculinist and feminist studies on the contextual constitution of sex and gender, with its surrounding debates. We explore the adoption and implications of the body as a phenomenon in archaeology and its connection to power-centred theories. As a case study, we use a body of data comprised of prehistoric Cypriot figurines (Chalcolithic and Bronze Age), and suggest that an archaeology of individuals may be possible in prehistoric contexts. In conclusion, we suggest that archaeologists move beyond rigid, binary categorizations and attempt to prioritize specific discourses of difference by implementing constructions of self or identity
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.