A chemically advanced, safe, controlled delivery system, utilising invert emulsion technology, with the aqueous phase containing scale inhibitor in solution, has been developed and manufactured for evaluation in a North Sea field trial. Benefits arising from the implementation of this new technology include rapid oil returns in an immediate post-squeeze era, reduction of deferred or lost oil costs, the potential to improve contact between inhibitor and in-situ adsorption sites and the ability to formulate packages for sensitive formations and low water cut wells. It is important for squeeze operations, that the emulsion can be injected safely downhole and encouraged to "break" during shut-in, allowing the aqueous inhibitor to be released and contact the pore structure, promoting effective retention. The "broken" oil phase maintains continuity between pore spaces and promotes rapid oil productivity to return, post-squeeze, as a result of relative permeability effects. The product will provide a safe application route for scale control in wells with pressure support limitations, drawdown restrictions and water sensitive formations. This paper reviews the team approach undertaken by chemical process plant, service company, oil company consortia and research and technology service providers to facilitate the first field trial of this novel, scale squeeze process. Extensive experimental evaluations and plant scale-up trials have been undertaken to develop a suitable chemical for field use. Emulsion manufacture requirements, phase volume considerations, destabilisation routes and rheological characteristics are discussed. Laboratory and offshore compatibility trials with appropriate field fluids are reported, together with core-flood investigations, these experiments reveal equivalent inhibitor returns to normal squeeze treatments, but post-squeeze oil production for the emulsion system shows inherent benefits. A well with a sulphate scaling problem and history of deferred oil production post-squeeze has been selected for a field trial of this new technology. The field treatment is discussed and preliminary post-squeeze results evaluated. Introduction & Concept Conventional squeeze injection strategies employ inhibitor based formulations and brine overflushes to penetrate radial distances of ~12 feet, yet relative permeability effects dictate that following shut-in, water production will be favoured, whilst oil will have to overcome physical barriers, before oil continuity between the pore spaces to the well bore can be achieved. The major costs associated with inhibitor squeeze practices therefore are those incurred as a direct result of deferred oil production, arising from failure to return to pre-squeeze oil productivity for prolonged periods. Formation damage and sand production may also be encountered in sensitive formations owing to the large volumes of active chemical being injected into the near well-bore region. An alternative to conventional squeeze treatments is presented and involves the use of invert emulsion technology, with the aqueous phase containing the scale inhibitor in solution. The use of invert emulsion technology in the oil industry is not new and has been successfully used in applications ranging from muds to retarded acids1,2. Controlled destabilisation downhole is necessary to facilitate in-situ "breakage" and release of separate oleic and brine phases. The oleic phase ensures oil continuity between pore spaces and provides desirable relative permeability characteristics, whilst the segregated brine phase now enables effective deposition of chemical inhibitor to the rock structure.
This paper was prepared for presentation at the 1999 SPE International Symposium on Oilfield Chemistry held in Houston, Texas, 16-19 February 1999.
opyrighi 1995, socIcty of Petrolem, Engumms. Inc. 'hIS paper WIIS prepared fcr r senlauon at k Offshore European Conference held m AberdeeIL 5-S .Sqxembcr 19 5. This per was selected for Ptesentmon by m SPE Program Comnuttec following rewew of i$%mmwm contained in m AM..., by the mib.n'fs). bmems of this paper. as pre~med. bavc no{ ban reviewed by the Somty of Petroleum EngInccm and are subfect to correct-n by tbe author(s). The matend, as psenled, das not mcusarily reflect any position of tfx Society of Petroleum Engmesra, its officers, or members. Pafms presented at SfW meetmgs am aubfect 10 publication Kvtew by Editoriai Committee of tbc Society of Petroleum Engincms. Pcnnisaion IO copy is restricted 10 an abstract of not motw than 300 wonh. Illustrations IMY not k cooicd. The abstract shoufd contain unapicuous acknowledgement of whc& or by wlhn UK %x 1632.45 SPEUT. rpr '" scntcd. Write Librarian, SPE, P.O. ha 833S36, lhchardson, TX 750S3-3S 6, U.S.A.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.