No abstract

BackgroundModification of joint tissue damage is challenging in late-stage osteoarthritis (OA). Few options are available for treating end-stage knee OA other than joint replacement.ObjectivesTo examine whether joint distraction can effectively modify knee joint tissue damage and has the potential to delay prosthesis surgery.Methods20 patients (<60 years) with tibiofemoral OA were treated surgically using joint distraction. Distraction (∼5 mm) was applied for 2 months using an external fixation frame. Tissue structure modification at 1 year of follow-up was evaluated radiographically (joint space width (JSW)), by MRI (segmentation of cartilage morphology) and by biochemical markers of collagen type II turnover, with operators blinded to time points. Clinical improvement was evaluated by Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) pain score.ResultsRadiography demonstrated an increase in mean and minimum JSW (2.7 to 3.6 mm and 1.0 to 1.9 mm; p<0.05 and <0.01). MRI revealed an increase in cartilage thickness (2.4 to 3.0 mm; p<0.001) and a decrease of denuded bone areas (22% to 5%; p<0.001). Collagen type II levels showed a trend towards increased synthesis (+103%; p<0.06) and decreased breakdown (−11%; p<0.08). The WOMAC index increased from 45 to 77 points, and VAS pain decreased from 73 to 31 mm (both p<0.001).ConclusionsJoint distraction can induce tissue structure modification in knee OA and could result in clinical benefit. No current treatment is able to induce such changes. Larger, longer and randomised studies on joint distraction are warranted.

In addition to JSW measurement, objective evaluation of osteophyte formation and subchondral bone density is possible on standard radiographs. The measured differences between OA and healthy individuals suggest that KIDA allows detection of changes in time, although sensitivity to change has to be demonstrated in long-term follow-up studies.

Objective. Osteoarthritis (OA) is a degenerative, disabling joint disease that affects >10% of the adult population. No effective disease-modifying treatment is available. In the present study, we used joint distraction, a relatively new treatment in which mechanical contact between the articular surfaces is avoided while intraarticular intermittent fluid pressure is maintained, to treat patients with severe OA of the ankle.Methods. Patients with severe ankle OA (n ‫؍‬ 57) who were being considered for joint fusion (arthrodesis) were treated with joint distraction in an open prospective study. In addition, a randomized trial was performed in 17 patients to determine whether joint distraction had a better outcome than debridement. A standardized evaluation protocol (physical examination, assessment of pain, mobility, and functional ability) was used, and changes in radiographic joint space width and subchondral sclerosis were measured. Thirtyeight patients in the open study have been followed up for >1 year, with up to 5 years of followup in 7 of them (mean ؎ SD followup 2.8 ؎ 0.3 years). Patients in the randomized study have been followed up for 1 year.Results. Significant clinical benefit was found in three-fourths of the 57 patients in the open prospective study. Most interestingly, the improvement increased over time. Radiographic evaluation showed increased joint space width and decreased subchondral sclerosis. Moreover, joint distraction showed significantly better results than debridement.Conclusion. The clinical benefit of joint distraction in the treatment of severe OA is proof of the concept. Although the followup remains relatively short and effects over time remain unpredictable, our study creates possibilities for the treatment of severe OA in general. Considering the high prevalence of OA and the lack of a cure for it, joint distraction as a treatment of severe OA may have great medical, social, and economic impact.

Results of the present prospective study confirm the findings of the previous retrospective study and suggest that Ilizarov joint distraction is a promising treatment for severe ankle OA, at least delaying the need for a joint fusion. Considering the high prevalence of OA and the lack of a remedy for this disorder, Ilizarov joint distraction as a treatment for OA may have great medical, social and economic impact.