The rapid growth of Internet-based applications, such as social media platforms and blogs, has resulted in comments and reviews concerning day-to-day activities. Sentiment analysis is the process of gathering and analyzing people's opinions, thoughts, and impressions regarding various topics, products, subjects, and services. People's opinions can be beneficial to corporations, governments, and individuals for collecting information and making decisions based on opinion. However, the sentiment analysis and evaluation procedure face numerous challenges. These challenges create impediments to accurately interpreting sentiments and determining the appropriate sentiment polarity. Sentiment analysis identifies and extracts subjective information from the text using natural language processing and text mining. This article discusses a complete overview of the method for completing this task as well as the applications of sentiment analysis. Then, it evaluates, compares, and investigates the approaches used to gain a comprehensive understanding of their advantages and disadvantages. Finally, the challenges of sentiment analysis are examined in order to define future directions.
The high rate of unplanned perforation, poor fixation, and nerve injury with freehand pedicle screw insertion has led to the use of image-guided navigation systems. Although these improve accuracy, they have several drawbacks that could be overcome by using image-based drilling guide templates. The accuracy of such templates was tested in a cadaveric study of screw placement in the lumbar, thoracic, and cervical regions of the spine. The dimensional stability with autoclaving of duraform polyamide, to be used for manufacturing the guides, was first determined using test specimens. Computed tomography (CT) images were acquired of 4 cadaveric spines, and placement of 4 cervical, 32 thoracic, and 14 lumbar screws was planned. Eighteen personalized drilling guide templates, in four different designs, were built. Orthopaedic surgeons experienced in the freehand techniques used the templates. CT images were acquired to assess placement position with respect to the pedicle. Duraform polyamide was found to be unaffected by sterilization. Two of the template designs facilitated the placement of 20/20 screws without error. Templates can lead to successful screw placement, even in small pedicles, providing their design is optimized for the application area, e.g. with enhanced rotational stabilization.
ObjectivesThe authors performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the possible correlation between ambient air pollution and orofacial cleft anomalies in newborns.Material and MethodsA literature search was performed using the PubMed and Google Scholar, using the keywords “air pollution”, “cleft lip”, “cleft palate”, “carbon monoxide”, “ozone”, “sulfur dioxide”, “nitrogen oxide”, “nitrogen dioxide”, and “aerodynamic diameter”. Eight epidemiologic articles met the criteria of correlating either carbon monoxide (CO), ozone (O3), nitrogen oxides (NOx), airborne particulate matter of less than 10 µm in diameter (PM10), or sulfur dioxide (SO2) exposures with clefting of the palate alone, clefting of the lip alone, or clefting of the lip and palate. Odds ratios were extracted from the eight studies and tabulated in this meta-analysis. Quality analysis showed six high quality, one medium quality, and one low quality study.ResultsMeta-analysis of the combined data confirmed the association of O3 exposure and risk of orofacial cleft anomalies (OR = 1.08; P = 0.02). NOx was consistently associated with decreased risk of cleft lip with or without palate and cleft palate.ConclusionsOzone showed the strongest correlation with cleft lip and cleft palate anomalies. However, the studies overall showed an inconsistent correlation between orofacial clefts and air pollutants.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.