BackgroundMultiple biologic and targeted synthetic disease-modifying rheumatic drugs (b/tsDMARDs) are approved for the management of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), including TNF inhibitors (TNFi), bDMARDs with other modes of action (bDMARD-OMA) and Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi). Combination of b/tsDMARDs with conventional synthetic DMARDs (csDMARDs) is recommended, yet monotherapy is common in practice.ObjectiveTo compare drug maintenance and clinical effectiveness of three alternative treatment options for RA management.MethodsThis observational cohort study was nested within the Swiss RA Registry. TNFi, bDMARD-OMA (abatacept or anti-IL6 agents) or the JAKi tofacitinib (Tofa) initiated in adult RA patients were included. The primary outcome was overall drug retention. We further analysed secondary effectiveness outcomes and whether concomitant csDMARDs modified effectiveness, adjusting for potential confounding factors.Results4023 treatment courses of 2600 patients were included, 1862 on TNFi, 1355 on bDMARD-OMA and 806 on Tofa. TNFi was more frequently used as a first b/tsDMARDs, at a younger age and with shorter disease duration. Overall drug maintenance was significantly lower with TNFi compared with Tofa [HR 1.29 (95% CI 1.14 to 1.47)], but similar between bDMARD-OMA and Tofa [HR 1.09 (95% CI 0.96 to 1.24)]. TNFi maintenance was decreased when prescribed without concomitant csDMARDs [HR: 1.27 (95% CI 1.08 to 1.49)], while no difference was observed for bDMARD-OMA or Tofa maintenance with respect to concomitant csDMARDs.ConclusionTofa drug maintenance was comparable with bDMARDs-OMA and somewhat higher than TNFi. Concomitant csDMARDs appear to be required for optimal effectiveness of TNFi, but not for bDMARD-OMA or Tofa.
BackgroundThe oral Janus kinase inhibitor tofacitinib (Tofa) was licensed in Switzerland in 2013 for the treatment of moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients having failed methotrexate. Besides Tofa, rheumatologists in Switzerland have the choice between 7 alternative bDMARDs licensed with similar indications, including 5 TNF inhibitors (TNFi) and 2 bDMARDs with other modes of action (OMA-bDMARDs).ObjectivesTo compare the drug retention rate of three alternative treatment options licensed with a similar indications, namely Tofa, TNFi and OMA-bDMARDs, using data from the Swiss registry.MethodsThis is an observational cohort study within the Swiss Clinical Quality Management registry (SCQM). All therapies with Tofa, TNFi, and OMA-bDMARDs initiated in adult RA patients between August 1, 2013 and Dec 1, 2016 were considered. The exposure of interest was treatment with Tofa vs TNFi and vs OMA-bDMARDs (Abatacept or Tocilizumab). The primary outcome was drug retention defined as the time from initiation to discontinuation of treatment. We used Kaplan Meier curves to display drug retention and Cox proportional hazard models stratified by seropositivity to analyze the hazard for treatment discontinuation. We adjusted for potential confounders, including gender, age, disease duration, seropositivity, BMI, smoking status, DAS28-CRP and the total number of previous bDMARDs. We applied multiple imputation to account for missing baseline covariate data.ResultsA total of 1996 therapies were initiated during the study period (376 Tofa, 928 TNFi, 692 OMA-bDMARDs). Some differences in disease and treatment characteristics existed between the 3 groups, in particular TNFi tended to be used in patients with fewer previous bDMARDs experience, younger age and shorter disease duration. The crude overall drug retention was similar between the 3 three drug groups (p=0.24) (Figure 1A). The adjusted analysis demonstrated a slightly higher hazard of drug discontinuation with TNFi compared to Tofa [HR 1.27 (95% CI: 1.02 – 1.57, p=0.03)], while no difference was observed for OMA-bDMARDs and Tofa [HR 1.03 (95% CI: 0.83 – 1.28, p=0.76)] (Figure 1B). Complete case results were consistent with results using multiple imputation of baseline covariates. Other variables significantly associated with drug discontinuation were a higher number of previous bDMARDs (p <0.001) and increasing BMI values (p=0.03), while combination therapy with sDMARDs tended to decrease discontinuation (p=0.08)ConclusionsThe results of this observational study suggest that Tofa is a valuable alternative to treatment options in RA, with Tofa drug retention at least comparable to other available bDMARDs.AcknowledgementsDisclosure. Investigator Initiated Research grant supported by Pfizer.Disclosure of InterestA. Finckh Grant/research support from: BMS, Speakers bureau: Abbvie, BMS, Pfizer, Roche, UCB, L. Herzog: None declared, A. Scherer: None declared, J. Dudler: None declared, B. Moeller: None declared, A. Ciurea: None declared, R. Mueller: None declared, P. Has...
Background Enthesitis is a hallmark of spondyloarthritis (SpA) with a substantial impact on quality of life. Reports of treatment effectiveness across individual enthesitis sites in real-world patients with axial SpA (axSpA) are limited. We investigated the evolution of enthesitis following tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) initiation in axSpA patients, both cumulatively and at specific axial and peripheral sites. Methods AxSpA patients in the Swiss Clinical Quality Management Registry were included if they initiated a TNFi, had an available Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Enthesitis Score, modified to include the plantar fascia (mMASES, 0–15), at start of treatment and after 6 and/or 12 months and ≥12 months follow-up. Logistic regression models were utilized to analyze explanatory variables for enthesitis resolution. Results Overall, 1668 TNFi treatment courses (TCs) were included, of which 1117 (67%) had active enthesitis at baseline. Reduction in mMASES at the 6- and 12-month timepoints was experienced in 72% and 70% of TCs, respectively. Enthesitis resolution at 6/12 months occurred in 37.9%/43.0% of all TNFi TCs and 40.7%/50.9% of first TNFi TCs. At 6 months, a significant reduction in the frequency of enthesitis was observed at all sites, except for the Achilles tendon and plantar fascia among first TNFi TCs, while at 12 months, reduction was significant at all sites in both TC groups. Enthesitis resolved in 60.3–77% across anatomical sites, while new incident enthesitis occurred in 4.0–13.5% of all TNFi TCs at 12 months. Both baseline and new-incident enthesitis occurred most frequently at the posterior superior iliac spine and the fifth lumbar spinous process. Younger age and lower mMASES at baseline were predictors of complete enthesitis resolution, while female sex and second- or later-line TNFi treatment were associated with persistence of enthesitis at 12 months. Conclusion In real-world axSpA patients treated with a TNFi, enthesitis improved in the majority of patients across all anatomical sites. Significant improvement at the Achilles and plantar fascia entheses was observed only at 12 months. Complete and site-specific enthesitis resolution occurred in ≥40% and ≥60% of TCs evaluated at 12 months, with a low incidence of new site-specific enthesitis. Trial registration Not applicable.
Background:The heterogeneity of synovial tissues from patients with arthritis could contribute to the interpatient variability in disease course, prognosis and treatment response. Single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) permits in-depth analysis of tissue heterogeneity, which could facilitate drug discovery and patient stratification for precision medicine.Objectives:To construct a comprehensive landscape of synovial cell types and molecular pathways in arthritis by integrating our and published scRNA-seq data, generated across different scRNA-seq technologies [Smart-seq2, Drop-seq], cell preparation protocols [dissociated unsorted, sorted cells] and types of arthritis [undifferentiated (UA), rheumatoid arthritis, osteoarthritis].Methods:Synovial tissues were obtained by ultrasound-guided biopsy from patients with UA [not fulfilling the classification criteria for a specific arthritis, n=3]. Biopsies were disintegrated [enzymatic and mechanical disruption] and cell viability assessed with trypan blue. ScRNA-seq libraries [2 per patient] were prepared with 10X Genomics Drop-Seq and sequenced on NovaSeq6000. Bioinformatics analysis of our and published [n=35] datasets1-3was performed using Seurat protocol4with correction for batch effects and filtering low-quality cells. Functional enrichment analysis of marker genes in clusters was done with STRING Protein-Protein networks. Synovitis was assessed with ultrasound and histology.Results:Our tissue disintegration protocol resulted in good cell yield and viability (92%, 72%, 100%). The synovial cellular heterogeneity detected by scRNA-seq reflected the histological findings [Krenn score, pathotype]. These were supported with the ultrasound and clinically assessed disease activity. The integrated analysis of 41 datasets from 38 donors yielded 41845 scRNA-seq cell profiles, 50% contributed by our dataset. An independent analysis of our data and their integration with published data showed that different scRNA-seq methods and protocols can identify all the major synovial cell types and their activation states (Figure 1) with large heterogeneity between donors. We identified a previously undescribed synovial cell population, which was located near the fibroblast cluster, was negative for canonical cell markers, but highly enriched in cell division genes (80% of marker genes). These cells comprised a mixed population of CD34-, podoplanin (PDPN)highor PDPNlowcells that were mostly negative for the sub-lining fibroblast marker THY. Furthermore, they appeared to be highly secretory (extracellular matrix components) and their gene expression profile was inclined towards cell migration, vascular development and insulin growth factor-dependent processes.Figure 1.Heatmap with top 20 cluster gene markers, gene enrichment analysis and UMAP plot of synovial cell clusters.Conclusion:By integrating synovial scRNA-seq data from 41845 cells, we identified a previously undescribed, highly proliferative and secretory synovial cell population in arthritis. We increased the number of known scRNA-seq synovial cell profiles in arthritis by two-fold and demonstrated the robustness of synovial scRNA-seq data outputs across different technologies and protocols. This broadens the current knowledge of synovial tissue heterogeneity and pathology in arthritis.References:[1]Stephenson W. et al. Nat Commun 2017.[2]Mizoguchi F. et al. Nat Commun 2017.[3]Zhang F. et al. Nat Immunol 2018.[4]Stuart T et al. Cell 2019Acknowledgments:This work is supported by Vontobel Foundation and medAlumni University of ZurichDisclosure of Interests:Sam G. Edalat: None declared, Raphael Micheroli: None declared, Tadeja Kuret: None declared, Kristina Buerki: None declared, Chantal Pauli: None declared, Snežna Sodin-Šemrl: None declared, Adrian Ciurea Consultant of: Consulting and/or speaking fees from AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis and Pfizer., Oliver Distler Grant/research support from: Grants/Research support from Actelion, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Competitive Drug Development International Ltd. and Mitsubishi Tanabe; he also holds the issued Patent on mir-29 for the treatment of systemic sclerosis (US8247389, EP2331143)., Consultant of: Consultancy fees from Actelion, Acceleron Pharma, AnaMar, Bayer, Baecon Discovery, Blade Therapeutics, Boehringer, CSL Behring, Catenion, ChemomAb, Curzion Pharmaceuticals, Ergonex, Galapagos NV, GSK, Glenmark Pharmaceuticals, Inventiva, Italfarmaco, iQvia, medac, Medscape, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma, MSD, Roche, Sanofi and UCB, Speakers bureau: Speaker fees from Actelion, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Medscape, Pfizer and Roche, Caroline Ospelt Consultant of: Consultancy fees from Gilead Sciences., Gregor Rot: None declared, Mojca Frank-Bertoncelj: None declared
Background: Enthesitis is a hallmark of spondyloarthritis (SpA) with substantial impact on quality of life. Reports of treatment effectiveness across individual enthesitis sites in real-world patients with axial SpA (axSpA) are limited. We investigated the evolution of enthesitis following tumour necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) initiation in axSpA patients, cumulatively and at specific axial and peripheral sites.Methods: AxSpA patients in the Swiss Clinical Quality Management Registry were included if they initiated a TNFi, had an available Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Enthesitis Score, modified to include the plantar fascia (mMASES, 0–15), at start of treatment and after 6 and/or 12 months and ≥12 months follow-up. Logistic regression models were utilized to analyze explanatory variables for enthesitis resolution. Results: Overall, 1668 TNFi treatment courses (TCs) were included, of which 1117 (67%) had active enthesitis at baseline. Reduction in mMASES at the 6- and 12-month time points was experienced in 72% and 70% of TCs, respectively. Enthesitis resolution at 6/12 months occurred in 37.9% and 43.0% of all TNFi TCs and 40.7% and 50.9% of first TNFi TCs. At 6 months, a significant reduction in the frequency of enthesitis was observed at all sites, except for the Achilles tendon and plantar fascia among first TNFi TCs while at 12 months, reduction was significant at all sites in both TC groups. Enthesitis resolved in 60.3%–77% across anatomical sites, while new incident enthesitis occurred in 4.0%–13.5% of all TNFi TCs at 12 months. Both baseline and new-incident enthesitis occurred most frequently at the posterior superior iliac spine and the fifth lumbar spinous process. Younger age and lower mMASES at baseline were predictors of complete enthesitis resolution, while female sex and second- or later-line TNFi treatment were associated with persistence of enthesitis at 12 months. Conclusion: In real-world axSpA patients treated with a TNFi, enthesitis improved in the majority of patients across all anatomical sites. Significant improvement at the Achilles and plantar fascia entheses was observed only at 12 months. Complete and site-specific enthesitis resolution occurred in ≥40% and ≥60% of TCs evaluated at 12 months, with a low incidence of new site-specific enthesitis.Trial registration: not applicable
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.