Using a discrete, intracellular 19 F nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) probe on transmembrane helix 6 of the neurotensin receptor 1 (NTS1), we aim to understand how ligands and transducers modulate the receptor's structural ensemble in a solution. For apo NTS1, 19 F NMR spectra reveal an ensemble of at least three conformational substates (one inactive and two activelike) in equilibrium that exchange on the millisecond to second timescale. Dynamic NMR experiments reveal that these substates follow a linear three-site exchange process that is both thermodynamically and kinetically remodeled by orthosteric ligands. As previously observed in other G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), the full agonist is insufficient to completely stabilize the active-like state. The inactive substate is abolished upon coupling to β-arrestin-1 (βArr1) or the C-terminal helix of Gα q , which comprises ≳60% of the GPCR/G protein interface surface area. Whereas βArr1 exclusively selects for pre-existing active-like substates, the Gα q peptide induces a new substate. Both transducer molecules promote substantial line broadening of active-like states, suggesting contributions from additional microsecond to millisecond exchange processes. Together, our study suggests that (i) the NTS1 allosteric activation mechanism may be alternatively dominated by induced fit or conformational selection depending on the coupled transducer, and (ii) the available static structures do not represent the entire conformational ensemble observed in a solution.

Malonyl-thioesters are reactive centers of malonyl-CoA and malonyl-S-acyl carrier protein, essential to fatty acid, polyketide and various specialized metabolite biosynthesis. Enzymes that create or use malonyl-thioesters spontaneously hydrolyze or decarboxylate reactants on the crystallographic time frame preventing determination of structure–function relationships. To address this problem, we have synthesized a panel of methylmalonyl-CoA analogs with the carboxylate represented by a sulfonate or nitro and the thioester retained or represented by an ester or amide. Structures of Escherichia coli methylmalonyl-CoA decarboxylase in complex with our analogs affords insight into substrate binding and the catalytic mechanism. Counterintuitively, the negatively charged sulfonate and nitronate functional groups of our analogs bind in an active site hydrophobic pocket. Upon decarboxylation the enolate intermediate is protonated by a histidine preventing CO2-enolate recombination, yielding propionyl-CoA. Activity assays support a histidine catalytic acid and reveal the enzyme displays significant hydrolysis activity. Our structures also provide insight into this hydrolysis activity. Our analogs inhibit decarboxylation/hydrolysis activity with low micromolar K i values. This study sets precedents for using malonyl-CoA analogs with carboxyate isosteres to study the complicated structure–function relationships of acyl-CoA carboxylases, trans-carboxytransferases, malonyltransferases and β-ketoacylsynthases.

Fluorine (19F) offers several distinct advantages for biomolecular nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy such as no background signal, 100% natural abundance, high sensitivity, and a large chemical shift range. Exogenous cysteine‐reactive 19F‐probes have proven especially indispensable for characterizing large, challenging systems that are less amenable to other isotopic labeling strategies such as G protein‐coupled receptors. As fluorine linewidths are inherently broad, limiting reactions with offsite cysteines is critical for spectral simplification and accurate deconvolution of component peaks—especially when analyzing systems with intermediate to slow timescale conformational exchange. Here, we uncovered noncovalent probe sequestration by detergent proteomicelles as a second source of offsite labeling when using the popular 19F‐probe BTFMA (2‐bromo‐N‐(4‐[trifluoromethyl]phenyl)acetamide). The chemical shift and relaxation rates of these unreacted 19F‐BTFMA molecules are insufficient to distinguish them from protein‐conjugates, but they can be easily identified using mass spectrometry. We present a simple four‐step protocol for Selective Labeling Absent of Probe Sequestration (SLAPS): physically disrupt cell membranes in the absence of detergent, incubate membranes with cysteine‐reactive 19F‐BTFMA, remove excess unreacted 19F‐BTFMA molecules via ultracentrifugation, and finally solubilize in the detergent of choice. Our approach builds upon the in‐membrane chemical modification method with the addition of one crucial step: removal of unreacted 19F‐probes by ultracentrifugation prior to detergent solubilization. SLAPS is broadly applicable to other lipophilic cysteine‐reactive probes and membrane protein classes solubilized in detergent micelles or lipid mimetics.

Using a discrete, intracellular 19F-NMR probe on Neurotensin receptor 1 (NTS1) transmembrane helix (TM) 6, we aim to understand how ligands and transducers modulate the receptors structural ensemble in solution. For apo NTS1, 19F-NMR spectra reveal an ensemble of at least three states (one inactive and two active-like) in equilibrium that exchange on the ms-s timescale. Dynamic NMR experiments reveal that these substates follow a linear three-site exchange process that is both thermodynamically and kinetically remodeled by orthosteric ligands. As previously observed in other GPCRs, the full agonist is insufficient to completely stabilize the active state. Receptor coupling to b-arrestin-1 or the C-terminal helix of Gaq, which comprises >60% of the GPCR/G protein interface surface area, abolishes the inactive substate. But whereas b-arrestin-1 selects for preexisting active-like substates, the Gaq peptide induces two new substates. Both transducer molecules promote substantial line-broadening of active states suggesting contributions from additional us-ms exchange processes. Together, our study suggests i) the NTS1 allosteric activation mechanism is alternatively dominated by induced fit or conformational selection depending on the coupled transducer, and ii) the available static structures do not represent the entire conformational ensemble observed in solution.

No abstract