To investigate the effectiveness of four selection protocols for improving reproduction in sheep, we evaluated nine selection lines and two random-bred control lines for lamb and wool production. Results were based on 25,026 dam and 30,628 lamb records from Rambouillet (R), Targhee (T), Columbia (C), and Polypay (P) sheep collected from 1976 through 1988. Phenotypic trends over years were positive (P < .01) for most reproductive traits, body weight, wool grade (coarser grades), and lamb weaning weight in nearly all selected lines. Small positive trends for both random-bred control lines indicated there were improvements in management and(or) environment during the period. Small but significant phenotypic declines in fleece weights occurred in most lines, including controls. Substantial genetic gains (P < .01) in litter weight weaned (120 d), net reproductive rate (lambs weaned divided by ewes mated), prolificacy, body weight, and weaning weight were made in nearly all selected lines. There were also small but significant improvements in milk score in most lines. There were significant genetic declines and improvements in fleece weights; however, the average genetic change in fleece weight for lines selected for litter weight weaned was negligible. Genetic improvement in litter weight weaned was attributed approximately 37% to prolificacy, 27% to percentage of lambs weaned, 17% to lamb weaning weight, 12% to fertility, and 7% to ewe viability from breeding to lambing. On average, selection based on independent culling levels (litter weight weaned plus yearling body weight), yearling body weight, or early puberty was only 85, 67, or 59%, respectively, as effective as that based solely on litter weight weaned for improving litter weight weaned. The net value of the average (over all breeds) annual increase in production per ewe resulting from selection for litter weight weaned accumulated over 12 yr to an estimated $11.40 and $21.51 annually for genetic and phenotypic increases, respectively.
Because of a traditional interest in inbreeding as a tool for breed improvement, it was desirable to evaluate the effects of inbreeding on the most important products of the sheep industry, lamb and wool production. The data for this study were based on 13,807 ewe and 16,470 lamb records from Rambouillet (R), Targhee (T), and Columbia (C) sheep collected over 9 or 10 yr from 54 inbred lines. Average inbreeding of the lambs and ewes involved was near 25 and 20%, respectively. The combined effects of lamb's and dam's inbreeding reduced litter weight weaned at 120 d approximately .5 kg for each percentage of increase in inbreeding in every breed. For ewes and lambs of average inbreeding, the reductions relative to noninbred ewes amounted to 12.4, 10.3, and 11.3 kg for R, T, and C, respectively. The reductions constituted declines in weight weaned per ewe of 34, 25, and 28%. Similarly, net reproduction rate (lambs weaned per ewes put into breeding) was reduced more than one percentage point for each percentage of increase in inbreeding, with net declines at average inbreeding of 31.7, 23.5, and 25.7 percentage points for each breed, respectively. These reductions were equivalent to reductions in net rate of 29, 20, and 23%. The combined effect of lamb and dam inbreeding reduced weaning weight by 3.5, 2.6, and 2.2 kg, which constituted reductions of 10, 7, and 6%, respectively. Reduced weaning weight was approximately 30% as important as reduced net reproduction rate in contributing to the decline in litter weight weaned. Effects on fleece weight were curvilinear and amounted to reductions of .35, .18, and .00 kg, respectively, at levels of average inbreeding; however, Columbia fleece weights declined rapidly at levels exceeding 20% for ewes. Potential selection differentials were reduced 16% at inbreeding levels of 25 and 20% for lambs and dams, respectively, and 62% at levels of 55 and 50%. The average economic loss per ewe in value of production was estimated at $17 for average inbreeding and as high as $36 for inbreeding approaching 50%. It seems that the use of inbreeding as a tool for improving productive merit in sheep is much more certain to be a detriment, economically and genetically, than an advantage.
Range ewes are commonly evaluated for milking ability by producers to determine the ewe's ability to rear lamb(s). The U.S. Sheep Experiment Station has subjectively scored (low, average, high) a ewe's milking ability within 24 h of lambing for many years. The relationship of subjective milk scores with lamb production was investigated using lambing records of Columbia (n = 1,731), Polypay (n = 1,129), Rambouillet (n = 1,704), and Targhee (n = 1,638) ewes. The incidence of high milk scores increased from less than 10% at first parity to 29 to 40% at second and greater parities. At maturity, Columbia ewes (38%) had the highest percentage of high milk scores. A positive association existed between ewe BW and her milk score at third and later parities. Ewes with high milk scores gave birth to heavier lambs (P < 0.05), whereas ewes with low milk scores were associated with lighter (P < 0.05) lambs at birth. Ewes with low milk scores weaned less (P < 0.05) total weight than ewes with better milk scores across all age groups for all breeds. Lighter weaned litter weights from ewes with low milk scores were linked to lighter birth weights and fewer weaned lambs. Differences for litter weight weaned between ewes with average and high milk scores were generally observed at 2 and 3 yr of age, when litter weights were heavier among ewes with high milk scores (P < 0.05) for all breeds. Between the ages of 1 and 3 yr, Columbia, Polypay, Rambouillet, and Targhee ewes with an average milk score weaned heavier (P < 0.05) litters (average differences of 10, 9, 13, and 12%, respectively) than ewes with low milk scores. For all breeds at all ages, individual lamb weaning weights were heavier (P < 0.05) when they were reared by ewes with high milk scores compared to lambs reared by ewes with low milk scores. Results suggest that milk score is an economically important trait in these four breeds and should be considered in management and breeding objectives; at a minimum, the incidence of low milk scores should be kept as small as possible.
Lifetime lamb and wool production of 1/4 and 1/2 Finnish Landrace (Finn) crossbred ewes in comparison with local purebred controls was evaluated under range conditions. A total of 1,234 ewe lambs, representing nine breed groups, were first exposed to breeding at 7 mo of age and subsequently retained with no artificial culling, except for debilitating unsoundness, through 7 yr of production. Mating was to Suffolk sires. Differences among pooled breed groups (1/4 Finns, 1/2 Finns and purebreds) generally were not significant for ewe viability to lambing, percentage of lambs born alive and lamb viability to weaning; nor were differences significant for fertility except among yearlings (12 mo at lambing) where 1/4 and 1/2 Finn fertility exceeded that of purebreds by 217 and 278%, respectively. However, for prolificacy, Finn-crosses were consistently superior to purebreds at all seven ages; 1/4 and 1/2 Finns averaged 24 and 48% higher, respectively, than purebreds. Further, Finn-cross ewes clearly excelled purebreds (P less than .05) in the two overall measures of reproduction--net reproductive rate and weight of lamb weaned. The superiority was sustained through all ages and averaged (over ages 2 through 7 yr) 29 and 49% for net reproductive rate and 24 and 41% for weight weaned, for 1/4 and 1/2 Finns, respectively. Conversely, for wool weight, purebreds were consistently superior at all ages; the lifetime averages of 1/4 and 1/2 Finn fleeces were only 90 and 77% as high, respectively, as those of purebreds. It was concluded, however, that the loss in value of wool production associated with Finn breeding was economically of much less importance than the gains made in weight of lamb weaned. The use of 1/4 and 1/2 Finn-crosses involving the above adapted domestic breeds increased the net value of lifetime production by approximately 18 and 29%, respectively.
The objective of this study was to compare maternal ability under natural and fostered rearing conditions in four breeds of sheep for lamb survival and growth to weaning age. Data included records from 1981 through 1991 of 24,696 lambs of four breeds, Rambouillet, Columbia, Targhee, and Polypay, reared by their natural dam, and 720 records of lambs fostered within their breed or across breeds. The majority (94%) of the foster lambs were from multiple-birth litters and were approximately .5 kg lighter than lambs reared by their natural dams (P < .05). Viability up to 3 wk of age was influenced by breed of foster dam; lambs reared by Polypay dams had the highest viability (96%) and lambs reared by Targhee dams the lowest (81%). Targhee dams were less successful in rearing foster lambs (75%) to weaning than the other breeds studied (average 84%). The lower viability of Targhee-reared foster lambs could not be explained by lower birth weights of foster lambs, increased starvation, or lower milk scores for Targhee dams. Although there were breed differences in weaning weights at 120 d of age, the foster lambs were lighter but the ranking by breed did not change. These results suggest that there are small breed differences in maternal ability for a ewe to raise her own lamb or foster lamb(s), except for the Targhee ewe, which has a lower success in rearing a foster lamb. Management practices to reduce the mortality rate of foster lambs should be investigated.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.