Plasma homocysteine and Cystatin C levels of 360 chronic haemodialysed patients were measured in fasting (191 men, mean age: 55.5 years; and 169 women, mean: 62.9 years). The patients were divided into subgroups: diabetes mellitus (34 men and 38 women 7 vs 8 IDDM). obliterative arteriosclerosis (68 men and 61 women), cardiovascular complications (75 men and 84 women) and stroke (16 men and 12 women), and after renal transplantation in chronic rejection (15 men and 5 female). Homocysteine was determined by IMx analyser from Abbott by FPIA method. Immunoturbidimetric method was used for quantification of Cystatin C (PETIA). The lowest Cystatin C concentration was found in diabetic patients (4.35 +/- 0.15 mg/l in men and 3.18 +/- 1.77 mg/l in women) and the highest one occurred in anuric and bilateral nephrectomised and transplanted chronic rejected patients (6.075 mg/l in men and 6.35 mg/l in women: p<0.001). The homocysteine levels (24.98 +/- 2.94 micromol/l in men and 23.88 +/- 1.76 micromol/l in women) exceeded the upper limit of reference range (<15.0 micromol/l). There was a significant difference in favour of subgroup of cardiovascular (27.25 micromol/l in men and 26.87 micromol/l in women) and stroke patients (27.16 micromol/l in men and 30.76 micromol/l in women p<0.001). Elevated levels were found in chronic rejected patients with accelerated arteriosclerotic events (25.94 micromol/l in men and 27.43 micromol/l in women). Good positive linear correlation was found between serum homocysteine and Cystatin C levels (r=0.2393 and 0.2252). The authors demonstrated hyperhomocysteinaemia associated with high Cystatin C concentration in four subgroups of haemodialysed patients (obliterative and accelerated arteriosclerosis, cardiovascular disease, and cerebrovascular complications and stroke).
BackgroundA considerable number of patients with severely elevated LDL-C do not achieve recommended treatment targets, despite treatment with statins. Adults at high cardiovascular risk with hypercholesterolemia and LDL-C ≥ 2.59 and ≤ 4.14 mmol/L (N = 250), pretreated with atorvastatin 20 mg were randomized to ezetimibe/simvastatin 10/40 mg or atorvastatin 40 mg for 6 weeks. The percent change in LDL-C and other lipids was assessed using a constrained longitudinal data analysis method with terms for treatment, time, time-by-treatment interaction, stratum, and time-by-stratum interaction. Percentage of subjects achieving LDL-C < 1.81 mmol/L, < 2.00 mmol/L, or < 2.59 mmol/L was assessed using a logistic regression model with terms for treatment and stratum. Tolerability was assessed.ResultsSwitching to ezetimibe/simvastatin resulted in significantly greater changes in LDL-C (-26.81% vs.-11.81%), total cholesterol (-15.97% vs.-7.73%), non-HDL-C (-22.50% vs.-10.88%), Apo B (-17.23% vs.-9.53%), and Apo A-I (2.56% vs.-2.69%) vs. doubling the atorvastatin dose (all p ≤ 0.002), but not HDL-C, triglycerides, or hs-CRP. Significantly more subjects achieved LDL-C < 1.81 mmol/L (29% vs. 5%), < 2.00 mmol/L (38% vs. 9%) or < 2.59 mmol/L (69% vs. 41%) after switching to ezetimibe/simvastatin vs. doubling the atorvastatin dose (all p < 0.001). The overall safety profile appeared generally comparable between treatment groups.ConclusionsIn high cardiovascular risk subjects with hypercholesterolemia already treated with atorvastatin 20 mg but not at LDL-C < 2.59 mmol/L, switching to combination ezetimibe/simvastatin 10/40 mg provided significantly greater LDL-C lowering and greater achievement of LDL-C targets compared with doubling the atorvastatin dose to 40 mg. Both treatments were generally well-tolerated.Trial registrationRegistered at clinicaltrials.gov: NCT00782184
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.