Our study met its primary end point, suggesting that Gemcitabine-Cetuximab has activity in cholangiocarcinoma. KRAS status was not associated with PFS, unlike skin toxic effect, which could be used as a surrogate marker for efficacy. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00747097.

524 Background: The SOR-CAP combination has shown clinical activity in several phase I-II trials involving metastatic breast cancer and mCRC patients (pts). SoMore aims to substantiate the combination’s effects in mCRC refractory to all medications and the predictive value of early metabolic response (MR) on survival. Methods: SoMore (EUDRACT 2010-023695-91) has 2 coprimary objectives: 1) to demonstrate an overall survival (OS) rate at 6 months (mths) > 30%, and 2) to compare OS between pts with and without MR. CAP was given at 1700 mg/m²/day (D), 2 weeks out of 3. SOR was administered at 600mg/D for the first cycle, then at 800mg/D until progression or unacceptable toxicity. FDGPET-CT was performed at baseline and before the 2nd cycle. MR analysis was centralized and blinded for the investigators. Results: From February to October 2011, 92 eligible pts were prospectively recruited in 6 Belgian centers: M/F: 54%/46%; ECOG PS 0/1: 55%/45%; median age: 61. A median of 5 treatment cycles were given (0-28+). Grade 3-4 toxic reactions were reported in 61.2%, mainly fatigue (18%), hand-foot skin reaction (14%) and diarrhea (11%), but no toxic death. 6.9% of the pts stopped therapy due to toxicity. 6 mths OS was 71% (95% CI: 61%-79%), significantly >30% (p<0.001). 47% of the 79 pts evaluable for metabolic assessment showed homogeneous MR (HMR) of all metastatic lesions, 32% mixed MR and 21% homogeneous non-MR. Median overall OS and PFS of the intent-to-treat population and of pts with and without HMR are shown in the table below. Hazard ratio for HMR was 0.34 (95% CI, 0.21 to 0.56) p-value <0.001 for PFS and 0.59 (95% CI, 0.37 to 0.96) p-value 0.03 for OS. Conclusions: These data suggest robust efficacy for the SOR-CAP combination in heavily pretreated mCRC, associated with high but manageable toxicity. Early MR assessment, by detecting unresponsive lesions within the whole body tumoral load, is able to capture the pts’ likelihood of benefit, opening the path to personalized medicine. Clinical trial information: NCT01290926. [Table: see text]

245 Background: Cholangiocarcinomas (CCK) are uncommon tumors with an increasing incidence and a poor prognosis. Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) expression and activation in CCK have been demonstrated. Methods: We conducted a multicenter phase II trial combining cetuximab (Ctx), an anti-EGFR chimerized IgG1 monoclonal antibody, to gemcitabine (Gem). Patients with either locally advanced (LA) or metastatic (M) CCK (excluding gallbladder) were included; no prior systemic therapy was allowed. Ctx was administrated at the initial dose of 400 mg/m2 and further injections at 250 mg/m2 every 7 days, and Gem was administrated at 1000 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, and 15 every 4 weeks. The primary endpoint was the progression-free survival (PFS) rate at 6 months. A Simon 2-stage design was used. We hypothesized that Gem/Ctx would improve 6 month-PFS rate from 20% to 40%. We needed 3 patients with PFS ≥ 6 months from the first 13 to further include a total of 43 patients. Results: Forty-four patients with advanced CCK (41% LA/59%M) were enrolled from 09/2008 to 01/2010. Median age was 61.5 years (range 40-86) and baseline ECOG PS was 0 for 68% and 1 for 32% of the patients. Forty-three percent of the patients had prior surgery. Forty-six percent of the patients were free from progression at 6 months. Median PFS was 5.8 months (95% CI, 4.4-7.4 m) and median overall survival was 11.6 months (95% CI, 8.7-14.6 m). Nine patients (20.9%) had partial response with a median duration of 5 months (range 2-10 m). Disease control rate (PR + SD > 8 weeks) was 81.4%. The most common grades 3/4 related-toxicities were haematological abnormalities (47.7%), skin rash (13.6%) and fatigue (11.3%). Due to toxicity, 6 patients discontinued study treatment; 14 and 3 patients had a Gem and Ctx dose reduction respectively. Among the nine responders, 8 experienced a skin rash of at least grade 2, suggesting a relationship between skin toxicity and efficacy. Conclusions: Our study met its endpoint, i.e., a PFS rate of 46% at 6 months, suggesting that Gem-Ctx combination had promising activity with a manageable toxicity profile in advanced CCK. Adding Ctx to the new standard of care Gem-cisplatin deserves further investigations in CCK. [Table: see text]

No abstract