Background/purposeRadial head replacement is frequently used in treatment of radial head fractures or sequela. Impossibility to restore a correct anatomy, acute elbow traumatic instability and failure of osteosynthesis hardware are the most common indications. The authors describe their case studies and results on the implantation of various radial head prostheses.MaterialsBetween June 2005 and June 2016, 28 radial head prostheses were implanted in the same number of patients with an average follow-up of 49 months (6–104). Indications for implantation were: Mason type III and IV radial head fractures and post-traumatic arthritis due to failure of previous treatments. Monopolar prostheses were used and were press-fit implanted via Kaplan’s lateral access and Kocher’s anconeus approach to the humeroradial joint. At the follow-up, assessments were made of the pain, according to the visual analogic scale, range of motion (ROM), stability and functionality according to the Mayo Elbow Performance Score, presence of osteolysis and mobilization during radiography tests, personal satisfaction of the patients, Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand and Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation outcomes measurements.ResultsAt the follow-up, we recorded an average level of pain of 1.8 in patients under acute treatments for radial head fractures and a marked reduction in the remaining cases from 6.7 to 2.1. ROM was found on average to be 107° of flexion–extension and 159° of pronosupination. Personal satisfaction was good–excellent in 23 cases. There was no case of infection; removal of the implant was necessary in three cases due to mobilization of the stem and oversized implants. In six cases, bone resorption was seen at the level of the prosthetic collar and it was in all cases asymptomatic.ConclusionsThe results of this study suggest that the use of prostheses, if well positioned, is a valid solution in the treatment of secondary arthritis and fractures of the radial head with poor prognosis, with good results in the reduction of pain, recovery of movement and improved quality of life.
We used high-resolution ultrasound to examine 35 median nerves (35 patients) with failed carpal tunnel decompression to identify the cause of failure. The carpal tunnel was examined before revision surgery, and the results were correlated with surgical findings. The cross-sectional area was measured, and nerve morphology was analysed at the sites of compression. We found persistent median nerve compression in 30 out of 35 patients. In 20 patients, the compression was caused by a residual transverse carpal ligament, in four by perineural fibrosis, in five by both of these causes and in one by tenosynovitis. In four patients, evidence of median nerve injury with an epineural/fascicular lesion was detected; and in one, no abnormalities were found. Surgical findings were consistent with the ultrasound findings except in one patient where tenosynovitis was associated with a giant cell tumour, which was missed by ultrasound. High-resolution ultrasound can provide helpful information in preoperative diagnosis of failed carpal tunnel decompression with good correlation between the ultrasound and surgical findings. Level of evidence: IV
The authors describe their experience in the treatment of the lesions of the distal tendon of the biceps through the anatomic insertion with Mitek mini-anchors using Henry anterior single-incision access. From 1996 to 2007, 12 patients, all male, average age 51.2 years, were treated for a lesion of the distal tendon of the biceps. In all cases, post-operative pain according to the visual analogical scale, the articular motion of the elbow, the occurrence of neurological disorders and the formation of ectopic ossifications appreciated by radiographies were evaluated. Furthermore, the patient's satisfaction and the impact on his quality of life were assessed using the DASH questionnaire. The results that were evaluated at an average follow-up of 65.6 months were satisfactory: in two cases a temporary deficit in the innervation area of the radial nerve occurred; in two cases ossifications formed at the tendon insertion level but with no clinical repercussions. All patients returned to their previous working activity and their level of satisfaction was good in five cases and very good in the other seven cases. In agreement with literature data, this technique, when compared with other treatment methods, proved effective and safe in the treatment of acute lesions of the distal tendon of the biceps brachii.
Background Scaphoid proximal pole fractures with avascular necrosis represent a complex surgical problem. Many reconstruction techniques are based on osteosynthesis with a vascularized or nonvascularized bone graft. These procedures do not allow early mobilization and therefore sometimes lead to unsatisfying functional results. In some cases, it is possible to perform a scaphoid hemiarthroplasty using a pyrocarbon implant (adaptive proximal scaphoid implant [APSI]) in place of the necrotic proximal pole, allowing an early mobilization and delaying palliative treatments such as 4-corner arthrodesis or proximal row carpectomy. Methods In this study, we reviewed all patients who had undergone a scaphoid hemiarthroplasty using APSI in our institutions from 1999 to 2017; the F.U. was performed through radiographic, clinical, and subjective (Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand) analysis. Results The performances of scaphoid proximal pole implants are encouraging; radiographic, clinical, and subjective outcomes were good, and the functional recovery proved to be fast and reliable over time. Conclusions This study reports our experience in the use of APSI implants, which proved to be a good alternative to traditional techniques for treating avascular necrosis of the proximal pole, still allowing further surgical steps in case of clinical worsening over time (wrist osteoarthritis). These patients are usually young and present high functional demands. Our experience is promising, but we believe that further evaluation over time will be needed.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.