A new immunochemiluminometric TSH assay (ICMA) was shown to offer improved analytical (+2 SD of zero) and functional (20% interassay coefficient of variation) sensitivity [0.003 vs 0.045 +/- 0.005 (+/- SE; range, 0.01-0.07); 0.018 vs. 0.23 +/- 0.02 (range, 0.10-0.35, mU/L); analytical vs. functional sensitivity limit for the ICMA vs. 10 other TSH immunometric assays, respectively]. The ICMA was used to study the physiological relationship between serum TSH and free T4 [as reflected by free T4 index (FT4I)] values at both steady state and 14 days after acute pharmacological T4 administration (3 mg oral T4 load plus 0.3 mg daily). At steady state, an inverse log/linear relationship was found between serum TSH and FT4I values (log TSH = 2.56 - 0.022 FT4I; r = 0.84; P less than 0.001). Ten to 14 days after acute T4 suppression in 5 euthyroid subjects, serum TSH/FT4I levels had plateaued after decreasing in parallel to the slope of the steady state relationship, suggesting that the degree of T4 suppression of TSH can be predicted from an individual's pituitary TSH/free T4 set-point and the magnitude of the serum T4 elevation achieved. Ambulatory and hospitalized patient sera, previously identified as having low (less than 0.1 mU/L) TSH levels by a less sensitive assay, were restudied by the TSH ICMA. Normal TSH values ranged from 0.39-4.6 mU/L, whereas the majority of hyperthyroid patients [52 of 54 (96% ambulatory) and 22 of 23 (96%, hospitalized)] had undetectable (less than 0.005 mU/L), basal TSH levels and absent TRH stimulated TSH responses. In contrast, most (32 of 37; 86%) of hospitalized nonhyperthyroid patients with low (less than 0.1 mU/L) TSH values due to nonthyroidal illness or glucocorticoid treatment had detectable (greater than 0.01 mU/L) basal and TRH stimulated TSH levels. The positive relationship between basal and TRH-stimulated TSH levels was shown to extend down to the detectability limit of the assay (0.005 mU/L), which further supported the authenticity of the subnormal TSH ICMA measurements. The new TSH ICMA is considered to represent the first of a third generation of clinical TSH assays, since it has a functional (interassay) sensitivity that is 2 orders of magnitude greater than that of typical first generation TSH RIAs and 1 order of magnitude greater than current second generation TSH immunometric methods. Such third generation TSH assays will facilitate both the optimization of T4 therapy as well as the diagnosis of hyperthyroidism in hospitalized patients with nonthyroidal illness.

Thyrotropin (TSH) concentrations were measured in 1580 hospitalized patients and 109 normal persons. Using the mean +/- 3 SD limits of the log values for the controls (0.35-6.7 milli-int. units/L), the proportion of abnormal TSH results in the hospitalized patients was 17.2%. TSH was undetectable (less than 0.1 milli-int. unit/L) in 3.1% of patients, suggesting hyperthyroidism, and high (greater than 20 milli-int. units/L) in 1.6%, suggesting hypothyroidism. On follow-up of 329 patients, 62% with abnormal TSH (less than 0.35 or greater than 6.7 milli-int. units/L) and 38% with normal TSH concentrations, only 24% of those with undetectable TSH had thyroid disease: 36% of them were being treated with glucocorticoids and 40% had nonthyroidal illness (NTI). Although half the patients with TSH greater than 20 milli-int. units/L had thyroid disease, 45% of patients had high TSH values associated with NTI. TSH concentrations usually returned towards normal when patients' therapy with glucocorticoids was discontinued or they recovered from NTI. TSH test sensitivity appeared good when the mean +/- 3 SD limits of the reference population were used, i.e., no cases of hyper- or hypothyroidism, as identified by free thyroxin index (FT4I), were missed. However, TSH test specificity was inferior to that of the FT4I test (90.7% vs 92.3%), although specificity could be improved to 97.0% if the wider TSH reference limits of 0.1 to 20 milli-int. units/L were used--limits considered pathological if applied to outpatients. Evidently, different reference intervals for TSH are needed for hospitalized and nonhospitalized patients. We conclude that a "sensitive TSH assay" is not a cost-effective thyroid screening test for hospitalized patients as compared with the FT4I.

To elucidate the mechanisms involved in altering serum 3,3',5'-triiodothyronine (rT3) levels with absolute or relative low 3,5,3'-triiodothyronine (T3) states in man, agents capable of lowering circulating T3 levels were sequentially administered to six euthyroid subjects. These agents included propylthiouracil (PTU) (300 mg/6 h X 5 d), dexamethasone (DEX) (2 mg/6 h X 5 d), and thyroxine (T4) (3.0 mg load and 0.3 mg/d X 5 d). 1125I] rT3 clearance rates and rT3 production rates were then determined. Increased serum rT3 levels and rT3/T4 values occurred with both PTU and DEX as compared with control, while T4 increased serum rT3 but did so without changing rT3/T4 values. The rT3 clearance rate was significantly decreased by PTU without altering production rate, while DEX increased the rT3 production rate without altering the rT3 clearance rate. T4 administration did not change rT3 clearance but proportionately increased rT3 production. These responses indicate that circulating rT3 predominantly originates from a non-PTU inhibitable deiodinase enzyme system located in extrahepatic tissues. This enzyme system appears to have a high capacity and low affinity for T4 and can be stimulated by DEX administration.

A new TSH immunoenzymometric assay was found to be capable of discriminating between the serum TSH values of normal subjects [2.28 +/- 1.02 (+/-SD); range, 0.6-6.5 microU/ml] and those of clinically euthyroid, antithyroid drug-treated (n = 22) or clinically thyrotoxic (n = 34) patients. While a wide spectrum of basal TSH values was found in the antithyroid drug group [ranging from undetectable (less than 0.05 microU/ml: 57%) to 17.9 microU/ml], all clinically thyrotoxic patients had undetectable values. In 33 patients receiving chronic oral T4 therapy for treatment of goiter (n = 15) or thyroid cancer (n = 18), 48% (6 of 33) had undetectable basal TSH levels and no TSH response to TRH stimulation. Detectable TSH levels were found in 42% (14 of 33), and TRH responsiveness was found in 52% (17 of 33). The TSH response to TRH stimulation was less than 2.0 microU/ml in 7 patients. Serum free T4 index, free T3 index, and free T4 levels and oral T4 dosage were inferior predictors of TRH responsiveness compared to the basal TSH value. No patient receiving more than 0.2 mg T4 daily or having a free T4 index above 18, a free T3 index above 205 or a free T4 level above 3.0 ng/dl had a TSH response to TRH. Seventy-six percent (16 of 21) of the patients, when reevaluated 1-6 weeks after increased oral T4 dosage, had a significant reduction in their serum thyroglobulin level. This was true of both patients with initially detectable (11 of 14) as well as undetectable (5 of 7) basal serum TSH levels. These findings support the concept that subnormal and, for that matter, as yet undetectable levels of circulating TSH may exert stimulatory effects on thyroid tissue.

No abstract