Since platelet -rich plasma (PRP) has been introduced to the field of oral surgery, it has become a widely accepted additive for bone regeneration treatment. The aim of this study was to evaluate the regenerative capacity of PRP in a sinus graft study on sheep. Twelve adult sheep underwent a bilateral sinus floor elevation procedure with cancellous bone from the iliac crest. Unilaterally, PRP was administrated to the bone graft. After 4 (six sheep) and 12 weeks (six sheep), bone biopsies were obtained from each site. With histomorphometric analysis we evaluated both the percentage of newly formed bone within the grafted site and the percentage of the contact area between the grafted bone and the newly formed bone. After 4 weeks the mean proportion of newly formed bone on the control side was 26.1%, whereas it was 29.2% on the test side. After 12 weeks it was 46.9% on the control side and 51.1% on the test side. The area of contact between the graft and the newly formed bone was 73.0% on the control side and 78.5% on the test side after 4 weeks, and 87.2% on the control side and 90.1% on the test side after 12 weeks. A statistical analysis did not reveal significant differences between the control and the test side. The results of the present experimental study show a regenerative capacity of PRP of quite low potency. Further basic research is needed to investigate more profoundly the possibilities of PRP in bone regeneration.

No abstract

Autogenous bone is the gold standard graft for sinus augmentation. The harvest of autogenous bone grafts from intraoral sites does often not provide sufficient bone volume and quality. A modified technique of harvesting a tibial cancellous graft is presented. With a micro-bone saw, a bony lid is prepared at the medial condyle of the tibia. The lid stays attached to the tendinous pes anserinus. Following the harvest, the lid is repositioned accurately. This method offers some distinct advantages. A sufficient amount of biologically highly valuable cancellous bone may be harvested for sinus grafting and possibly other surgeries with bone augmentation. The procedure may be performed under local anaesthesia and does not require hospitalisation. Neither major complications nor serious postoperative morbidity were observed.

No abstract

Background Many surgeons routinely place intraperitoneal drains after elective colorectal surgery. However, enhanced recovery after surgery guidelines recommend against their routine use owing to a lack of clear clinical benefit. This study aimed to describe international variation in intraperitoneal drain placement and the safety of this practice. Methods COMPASS (COMPlicAted intra-abdominal collectionS after colorectal Surgery) was a prospective, international, cohort study which enrolled consecutive adults undergoing elective colorectal surgery (February to March 2020). The primary outcome was the rate of intraperitoneal drain placement. Secondary outcomes included: rate and time to diagnosis of postoperative intraperitoneal collections; rate of surgical site infections (SSIs); time to discharge; and 30-day major postoperative complications (Clavien–Dindo grade at least III). After propensity score matching, multivariable logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards regression were used to estimate the independent association of the secondary outcomes with drain placement. Results Overall, 1805 patients from 22 countries were included (798 women, 44.2 per cent; median age 67.0 years). The drain insertion rate was 51.9 per cent (937 patients). After matching, drains were not associated with reduced rates (odds ratio (OR) 1.33, 95 per cent c.i. 0.79 to 2.23; P = 0.287) or earlier detection (hazard ratio (HR) 0.87, 0.33 to 2.31; P = 0.780) of collections. Although not associated with worse major postoperative complications (OR 1.09, 0.68 to 1.75; P = 0.709), drains were associated with delayed hospital discharge (HR 0.58, 0.52 to 0.66; P < 0.001) and an increased risk of SSIs (OR 2.47, 1.50 to 4.05; P < 0.001). Conclusion Intraperitoneal drain placement after elective colorectal surgery is not associated with earlier detection of postoperative collections, but prolongs hospital stay and increases SSI risk.