No abstract

Objective To investigate the cerebellar inhibitory influence on the primary motor cortex in patients with focal dystonia using a cerebellar continuous theta-burst stimulation protocol (cTBS) and to evaluate any relationship with movement abnormalities. Methods Thirteen patients with focal hand dystonia, 13 patients with cervical dystonia and 13 healthy subjects underwent two sessions: (i) cTBS over the cerebellar hemisphere (real cTBS) and (ii) cTBS over the neck muscles (sham cTBS). The effects of cerebellar cTBS were quantified as excitability changes in the contralateral primary motor cortex, as well as possible changes in arm and neck movements in patients. Results Real cerebellar cTBS reduced the excitability in the contralateral primary motor cortex in healthy subjects and in patients with cervical dystonia, though not in patients with focal hand dystonia. There was no correlation between changes in primary motor cortex excitability and arm and neck movement kinematics in patients. There were no changes in clinical scores or in kinematic measures, after either real or sham cerebellar cTBS in patients. Conclusions The reduced cerebellar inhibitory modulation of primary motor cortex excitability in focal dystonia may be related to the body areas affected by dystonia as opposed to being a widespread pathophysiological abnormality. Significance The present study yields information on the differential role played by the cerebellum in the pathophysiology of different focal dystonias.

Objective:To perform a simultaneous evaluation of potential risk/protective factors of Parkinson’s disease (PD) in order to identify independent risk/protective factors, assess interaction among factors and determine whether identified risk factors predict etiological subtypes of PD.Methods:We designed a large case-control study assessing 31 protective/risk factors of PD, including environmental and lifestyle factors, comorbidities, and drugs. The study enrolled 694 PD patients and 640 healthy controls from six neurological centers. Data were analyzed by logistic regression models, additive interaction models, and cluster analysis.Results:The simultaneous assessment of 31 putative risk/protective factors of PD showed that only coffee consumption (odds ratio [OR]: 0.6; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.4-0.9), smoking (OR: 0.7; 95% CI: 0.6-0.9), physical activity (OR: 0.8; 95% CI: 0.7-0.9), family history of PD (OR: 3.2; 95% CI: 2.2- 4.8), dyspepsia (OR: 1.8; 95% CI:1.3-2.4), exposure to pesticides (OR: 2.3; 95% CI:1.3- 4.2), oils (OR: 5.6; 95% CI: 2.3-13.7), metals (OR: 2.8; 95% CI: 1.5-5.4), and general anesthesia (OR: 6.1; 95% CI: 2.9-12.7) were independently associated with PD. There was no evidence of interaction among risk/protective factors, but cluster analysis identified four subtypes with different risk factor profiles. In Group 1, all patients had a family history of PD, while dyspepsia or exposure to toxic agents were present in 30% of patients. In Group 2 and 3, a family history of PD was lacking, while exposure to toxic agents (Group 2) and dyspepsia (Group 3) played major roles. Group 4 consisted of patients with no risk factors.Conclusions:This study demonstrated that nine factors independently modify PD risk by coexisting in the same patient rather than interacting with others. Our study suggests the need for future preventive strategies aimed at reducing the coexistence of different risk factors within the same subject.

Introduction The Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS) is commonly used to assess depressive symptoms, but its psychometric properties have never been examined in Italian people with Parkinson's disease (PD). The aim of this study was to study the reliability and validity of the Italian version of the GDS in a sample of PD patients. Methods The GDS was administered to 74 patients with PD in order to study its internal consistency, test-retest reliability, construct, and discriminant validity. Results The internal consistency of GDS was excellent (α = 0.903), as well as the test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.941 [95% CI: 0.886–0.970]). GDS showed a strong correlation with instruments related to the depression (ρ = 0.880) in PD (ρ = 0.712) and a weak correlation with generic measurement instruments (−0.320 < ρ <−0.217). An area under the curve of 0.892 (95% CI 0.809–0.975) indicated a moderate capability to discriminate depressed patients to nondepressed patient, with a cutoff value between 15 and 16 points that predicts depression (sensitivity = 87%; specificity = 82%). Conclusion The GDS is a reliable and valid tool in a sample of Italian PD subjects; this scale can be used in clinical and research contexts.

No abstract