Summary: Background: Any surgical manoeuvre that involves cessation of blood supply to an organ with subsequent re‐establishment of blood flow can result in ischaemia/reperfusion (I/R) injury. The consequences of such injury are local and remote tissue destruction. 
Methods: I/R is characterized by ‘no reflow phenomenon’ and interstitial oedema formation. Changes in the production of nitric oxide (NO) and superoxide play an important role in the development of I/R. Overproduction of reactive oxygen‐derived free radicals (OFR) leads to a consumption and depletion of endogenous scavenging antioxidants. 
Results: Direct NO measurements showed a production of large concentrations of NO from cNOS at the beginning of ischaemia. Intracellular influx of Ca2+ after onset of ischaemia activates cNOS, leading to local depletion of L‐arginine and subsequently to disarrangement of cNOS, which produces superoxide instead of NO. Microvascular constriction during ‘no reflow’ reflects deficiency in vasodilator NO due to its consumption by vasoconstrictor oxygen free radicals. Stimulated production of thromboxane A2 and endothelin release may also promote ‘no reflow’. 
Conclusions: At least two major strategies are viable for preventing I/R injury: (a) treatment with L‐arginine and their analogues, or BH4, thus preventing L‐arginine and H4B deficient conditions, so that cNOS will not produce excessive O2–; (b) scavenging O2– already produced by cNOS and other potential sources of O2– by using large concentrations of free radical scavengers. Further research on oxidant/antioxidant biochemistry and its clinical application is needed.

Background/Aim: Local blood flow failure (no-reflow phenomenon) during ischemia/reperfusion (I/R) injury may be mediated by interstitial edema formation (passive vasoconstriction) and/or microvascular spasm (active vasoconstriction). The development of the no-reflow phenomenon in the rabbit hind limb I/R model and the influence of treatment with L-arginine and/or antioxidative vitamins were investigated. Methods: Untreated rabbits were compared with those treated with L-arginine (4 mg/kg/min) or antioxidative vitamins (0.4 ml/kg) alone or in combination during hind limb I/R (2.5/2 h). Interstitial edema formation and microvessel diameter alterations were measured morphometrically. Capillary blood perfusion was measured continuously with laser Doppler flowmetry. Results: I/R injury was expressed by interstitial edema formation (interstitial space increase by 80%), microvascular constriction (microvessel cross-sectional area decrease by 30%), and development of no-reflow phenomenon (blood flow reduction by 60%). Treatment with antioxidative vitamins alone or L-arginine alone reduced interstitial edema by 22 and 31%, consequently, while combined L-arginine/antioxidative vitamin treatment showed a more pronounced edema reduction by 40%. Treatment with only antioxidative vitamins failed to influence the development of no-reflow, although interstitial edema formation was reduced. L-Arginine treatment alone or in combination with antioxidative vitamins prevented microvascular constriction and preserved blood flow after reperfusion without development of no-reflow despite still apparent interstitial edema. Conclusions: Affections of active vasomotility and not merely passive changes of external pressure (i.e., interstitial edema formation) should be considered important in the development of microvascular constriction during ‘no-reflow’ phenomenon.

Enhanced production of superoxide in L-arginine-depleted environments and concomitant reduction of nitric oxide (NO) concentration are involved in ischemia-reperfusion (I/R) injury. Treatment with L-arginine or antioxidative vitamins alone and in combination was used to mollify I/R injury in skeletal muscle. Untreated rabbits were compared with those treated with L-arginine/antioxidative vitamin cocktail Omnibionta only, or a combination of L-arginine/ antioxidative vitamins during hind limb I/R (2.5 hours/2 hours). NO was continuously measured in vivo. Plasma malondialdehyde (MDA) served as the measure of oxygen free radical formation. Interstitial edema formation, microvessel diameter alterations, microvessel plugging, and blood flow changes were used as indicators of I/R injury. The MDA level in untreated animals 2 hours after reperfusion was significantly higher than in control animals (0.81 micromol/L +/- 0.14 micromol/L vs 0.57 micromol/L +/- 0.11 micromol/L; P<.05), indicating enhanced production of oxygen free radicals. This sequela paralleled the decreasing concentration of NO, which dropped below the detection limit (1 nmol/L) after reperfusion. Microvascular changes during I/R injury were expressed as a 40% decrease in microvessel diameter and adhesion of neutrophils in 20% of microvessels, which led to a consequent 60% reduction in blood flow, demonstrating "no reflow" (reperfusion failure after restoration of blood flow). The increase in the fraction of muscle interfiber area by 85% indicated prominent edema formation. Treatment with antioxidative vitamins alone had a minimally positive effect on edema formation and microvascular plugging, possibly by suppression of oxygen free radical production, as expressed by the reduction in plasma MDA levels. However, this therapy failed to preserve basal NO production and to protect from microvascular constriction and no reflow. Treatment with L-arginine alone had a stronger protective effect, maintaining basal NO production, further reduction of neutrophil plugging, abolition of microvascular constriction, and no reflow. The combination of antioxidative vitamins and L-arginine was the best treatment against I/R injury, expressed not only by the protection of microvessel constriction, but also by abolition of microvascular plugging, increase in NO production (68 nmol/L +/- 5 nmol/L) over the basal level (52 nmol/L +/- 7 nmol/L), and higher blood flow, as compared with treatment with L-arginine or antioxidative vitamins alone.

No abstract

We conclude that neither STZ nor OVX altered the early phase of graft consolidation. Our findings are limited by the weak osteogenic potential of the rat calvaria in this augmentation model.