Chronic bioassays have revealed that alachlor caused nasal, thyroid, and stomach tumours in rats but was not carcinogenic in mice. Significant increases in thyroid and stomach tumours were observed only at doses that exceeded the maximum tolerated dose (MTD). While nasal tumours were found at doses below the MTD, they were small and benign in nature. This publication describes the work undertaken by Monsanto to understand the carcinogenic mode of action of alachlor in the rat and to investigate the relevance to humans. The genetic toxicity of alachlor has been investigated in an extensive battery of in vitro and in vivo test systems. In addition, target-specific mutagenicity tests, such as the COMET assay and DNA binding in nasal tissue, were carried out to investigate any possible in-situ genotoxic action. The weight-of-evidence analysis of all available data clearly demonstrates that alachlor exerts its carcinogenicity in the rat by non-genotoxic mechanisms. In the rat, alachlor is initially metabolised primarily in the liver through the P-450 pathway and by glutathione conjugation. The glutathione conjugates and their metabolites undergo enterohepatic circulation with further metabolism in the gastrointestinal tract, liver, and then nasal tissue where they can be converted to a diethyliminoquinone metabolite (DEIQ). This electrophilic species binds to the cysteine moiety of proteins leading to cell damage and increased cell turnover. When comparisons of in vitro nasal metabolic capability were made, the rat's capacity to form DEIQ from precursor metabolites was 38 times greater than for the mouse, 30-fold higher than monkey, and 751 times greater than that of humans. This data is consistent with the results of studies showing in vivo formation of DEIQ-protein adducts in the nasal tissue of rats but not mice or monkeys. The lack of DEIQ nasal adducts in mice is consistent with the lack of nasal tumours in that species. When the differences between rat and humans in the capacity for initial glutathione conjugation by the liver and nasal tissue are also taken into account, the rat is found to be even more susceptible to DEIQ formation than man. Based on this, it is clear that the potential for DEIQ formation and nasal tumour development in humans is negligible. The mechanism of stomach tumour formation has been studied in the rat. The results demonstrated that the mechanism is threshold-sensitive and involves a combination of regenerative cell proliferation and a gastrininduced tropic effect on enterochromaffin-like (ECL) cells and stem cells of the mucosal epithelium. The absence of a carcinogenic effect in mice and of any preneoplastic effect in monkeys treated with very high doses is indicative of the species-specific aspect of this mechanism of action. The results of studies on thyroid tumour production indicate that alachlor is acting indirectly through the pituitary-thyroid axis by increasing the excretion of T4 by enhanced glucuronidation and subsequent biliary excretion. The increased excretion reduces plasma T4 levels and a feedback mechanism leads to increased synthesis of TSH by the pituitary. Chronic stimulation of the follicular epithelium of the thyroid by TSH produces hyperplasia and ultimately tumour formation. This non-genotoxic, threshold-based mechanism is well established and widely considered to be not relevant to humans. In this work, the modes of action for the three types of tumours elicited in the rat by alachlor were investigated. All are based on non-genotoxic, threshold-sensitive processes. From all the data presented it can be concluded that the tumours detected in the rat are not relevant to man and that alachlor presents no significant cancer risk to humans. This conclusion is supported by the lack of mortality and tumours in an epidemiology study of alachlor manufacturing workers.

Comprehensive toxicological studies of the herbicide acetochlor are presented and discussed. Although it gave a negative profile of responses in the many toxicity tests conducted there were some findings that prompted further investigation. First, although non-mutagenic in the Sal monella assay, acetochlor was clastogenic to mammalian cells treated in vitro. This clastogenic potential was not expressed in vivo in four rodent cytogenetic assays (bone marrow and germ cells). Second, although acetochlor gave a negative response in rat liver UDS assays when tested at the acute MTD, gavage administration of a single, supra- MTD dose (2000 mg/kg) gave a weak positive assay response. This dose-level (2000 mg/kg) was necrotic to the liver, depressed hepatic glutathione levels by up to ∼80%, altered the metabolism of acetochlor, and was associated with up to 33% lethality. In contrast, reference liver genotoxins such as DMN, DMH and 2AAF were shown to elicit UDS in the absence of such effects, and at ∼400 x lower dose-levels. Finally, microscopic nasal polypoid adenomas were induced in the rat when acetochlor was administered for two years at the maximum tolerated dose (MTD). The tumours were not life-threatening, they did not metastasize, and no DNA damage was induced in the nasal cells of rats maintained on a diet containing the MTD of acetochlor for either 1 or 18 weeks (comet assay). In order to probe the mechanism of action of these high dose toxicities a series of chemical and genetic toxicity studies was conducted on acetochlor and a range of structural analogues. These revealed the chloroacetyl sub structure to be the clastogenic species in vitro. Although relatively inert, this substituent is preferentially reactive to sulphydryl groupings, most evidently, to glutathione (GSH). Similar chemical reactivity and clastogenicity in vitro was observed for two related chemicals bearing a chloroacetyl group, both of which have been defined as non-carcinogens in studies reported by the US NTP. These collective observations indicate that the source of the clastogenicity of acetochlor in vitro is also the source of its rapid detoxification in the rat in vivo, via reaction with GSH. Metabolic studies of acetochlor are described which reveal the formation of a series of GSH-associated biliary metabolites in the rat that were not produced in the mouse. The metabolism of acetochlor in the rat changes with increasing dose-levels, probably because of depletion of hepatic GSH. It is most likely that a rat-specific metabolite is responsible for the rat nasal tumours observed uniquely at elevated dose-levels. The absence of genetic toxicity to the nasal epithelium of rats exposed acutely or sub- chronically to acetochlor favours a non-genotoxic me chanism for the induction of these adenomas. The observation of a time- and dose-related increase in S- phase cells in the nasal epithelium is consistent with this conclusion. Despite some confusion caused by the early use of peri- lethal gavage administrations of acetochlor to rodents, and supra-MTD dietary concentrations in some of the chronic studies, the available MTD data are consistent with acetochlor not posing a genetic or carcinogenic hazard to humans.

A physiologically based pharmacokinetic model was developed to describe the distribution of hexachlorobenzene (HCB) in the rat after oral administration or injection. The model was based on flow-limited blood perfusion of HCB to tissues and organs of the body. A set of simultaneous differential equations were solved for the different tissue concentrations as a functions of time. The model allowed for elimination of HCB by excretion. The model also allowed for differential growth of various tissues over the course of an experiment. Computer simulations using the model indicated that growth of animals during the course of dosing experiments can greatly increase the apparent half-life of HCB.

Studies of absorption, distribution, metabolism, and elimination (ADME) have long been recognized as important in the evaluation of the pharmacological efficacy of pharmaceutical agents. In recent years, the importance of ADME studies in toxicology also has become increasingly apparent. In realization of the importance of ADME studies, regulatory agencies have established guidelines governing the conduct of these studies. To be of maximum utility, it is desirable that ADME and pharmacokinetic studies be closely integrated with the toxicity testing protocol. However, in many instances this is not the case, which results in ADME and pharmacokinetic studies that are often chronologically and philosophically remote from the toxicity testing protocols. An inevitable consequence of this approach is that it frequently leads to the generation of ADME data that are of limited use in the process of toxicity evaluation and risk assessment. Recently, there has been increased focus on developing testing strategies that would result in the development of ADME data with greater application to toxicity testing and risk assessment. An example of such an approach is the concept of a tiered approach to the conduct of ADME studies. An important aspect of the tiered approach is generating ADME data at an earlier stage during the toxicity testing of a chemical. This could be effected by acceptance of the concept of a minimum experimental data set for a chemical. This minimum data set could be conducted in a timely and economic manner and would develop data addressing three fundamental questions: Is the chemical absorbed? Is the chemical metabolized? Does the chemical persist? The data generated under a minimum data set scenario would not be designed to provide sufficient information for utility in risk evaluation. However, it would provide important information at a much earlier stage of toxicity testing than currently generated under existing testing strategies. Such information would be of importance in the design of toxicity testing studies. Additional ADME and pharmacokinetic information could then be conducted when a specific concern (e.g., toxicity) becomes apparent. The advantage of this approach is that it allows the design of these additional follow-up studies to be tailored to the particular toxicity or risk-evaluation end point (e.g., target organ, species extrapolation, route evaluation, etc.). The specifics of the experimental aspects of the design of ADME and pharmacokinetics studies are discussed. In this development of alternate, and more efficient procedures, for the conduct of metabolism studies, it has become apparent that the potential use of ADME data obtained under studies designated by the regulatory guidelines is often of little use in addressing the major concerns of risk assessment (i.e., species, dose, and route extrapolation). In considering alternate approaches it has become apparent that increased use of dosimetry models such as physiologically based pharmacokinetic models could have significant utility ...

No abstract