No abstract

Clomiphene is a first line treatment for anovulation, a common cause of infertility. Response to clomiphene is variable and unpredictable. Tamoxifen is structurally related to clomiphene, and also shows considerable variation in response. CYP2D6 and CYP3A4 are major contributors to the metabolism of tamoxifen. The aim of the present work was to define the role of CYP2D6 and CYP3A4 in the in vitro metabolism of enclomiphene, regarded by some as the more active isomer of clomiphene. Enclomiphene (25 microM) was incubated with human liver microsomes (from 4 extensive (EM) and 1 poor metaboliser with respect to CYP2D6) and with microsomes from lymphoblastoid cells expressing CYP2D6. Microsomes from all the EM livers and recombinant CYP2D6 metabolised enclomiphene (the disappearance of drug ranged from 40-60%). No metabolism was detected in microsomes from the PM liver. Quinidine (1 microM) completely inhibited the metabolism of enclomiphene by all the EM livers and by recombinant CYP2D6 (p<0.001, one way ANOVA). Ketoconazole (2 microM) had no significant effect on enclomiphene metabolism in 3 out of the 4 EM livers. The extent of enclomiphene metabolism was correlated with the amount of CYP2D6 present (p<0.001, Pearson correlation test). The findings indicate that CYP2D6 is primarily responsible for the metabolism of enclomiphene.

Aims The aim of this study was to establish whether pharmacokinetic differences between two pro-drugs of methylprednisolone (MP) are likely to be of clinical significance. Methods This study was a single-blind, randomized, crossover design comparing the bioequivalence of MP released from the pro-drugs Promedrol (MP suleptanate) and Solu-Medrol (MP succinate) after a single 250 mg (MP equivalent) intramuscular injection to 20 healthy male volunteers. Bioequivalence was assessed by conventional pharmacokinetic analysis, by measuring pharmacodynamic responses plus a novel approach using pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic modeling. The main measure of pharmacodynamic response was whole blood histamine (WBH), a measure of basophil numbers. Results The MP C max was less for MP suleptanate due to a longer absorption halflife of the prodrug from the intramuscular injection site. The bioavailability of MP was equivalent when based on AUC with a MP suleptanate median 108% of the MP succinate value (90% CI: 102-114%). For C max the MP suleptanate median was 81% of the MP succinate value (90% CI: 75-88%). The t max for MP from MP suleptanate was delayed relative to MP succinate. The median difference was 200% (90% non-parametric CI: 141-283%). The area under the WBH effect-time curve (AUEC) and the maximum response (E max ) were found to be equivalent (90% CI: 98-113% and 93-109% respectively). The maximum changes in other white blood cell counts, blood glucose concentration and the parameters of the pharmacodynamic sigmoid Emax model (EC 50 , E max and c) were also not significantly different between prodrugs. Conclusions MP suleptanate is an acceptable pharmaceutical alternative to MP succinate. The use of both pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic response data together gives greater confidence in the conclusions compared with those based only on conventional pharmacokinetic bioequivalence analysis.

A chiral high pressure liquid chromatography method was developed to measure the separate isomers of prilocaine in plasma after administration of the racemate. The concentrations of the isomers in six patients were similar (S(+)/R(-) = 1.06 (SD 0.06)) after brachial plexus block with 1.5% (RS)-prilocaine hydrochloride 35 ml, suggesting that a higher systemic safety margin may not be achieved by substituting racemic prilocaine by one of its isomers. Much higher plasma concentrations of the S(+)- than the R(-)-form after oral administration of 300 mg of the racemate (n = 4) indicated a large difference in intrinsic metabolic clearance of the isomers on first pass through gut, liver or both organs.