Introduction: In the Sri Lankan health system there is no system for registering a patient under any health care provider and there is no established referral and back referral system in practice. Still there is communication between primary care doctors and specialists mostly through conventional letters. This study was conducted to explore views of specialists on the referral process of the country. Methodology: This was a descriptive cross sectional study. A self administered questionnaire based on the data gathered in earlier qualitative, explorative research was prepared to gather data. A postal survey was conducted among Specialists island wide. Results: 1100 specialists were included in the study and the response rate was 20%. Although specialists expect a referral letter from general practitioners they receive one only around 50% of the occasions. They were not happy with the quality of letters and expected a comprehensive referral letter. They were keen to reply but time constraints (50%), lack of secretarial support (36%) and perception that reply will not reach the sender (31%) were obstacles in replying. Continuous medical education, use of structured referral forms and strengthening training programs were suggested to improve communications. Conclusions and recommendations: Specialists have a positive attitude towards their professional relationship with GPs and they should be made aware of this and try to enhance their communication with specialists. There should be rectifiable measures in the systems which facilitate coordination and communication between the two parties and then the referral process will become meaningful and beneficial to all the stakeholders.

Introduction: Training medical students in the setting of family/general practice has increased considerably in the past few decades in Sri Lanka with the introduction of family medicine into the undergraduate curriculum. This study was conducted to explore patients' attitudes towards training students in fee levying general practices. Methodology: Six general practices, to represent different practices (urban, semi urban, male and female trainers) where students undergo training, were selected for the study. Randomly 50 adult patients were selected from each practice and they responded to a self administered questionnaire following a consultation where medical students had been present. Results: 300 patients (57.2 % females) participated in the study. 44.1% had previously experienced students. 30.3% were able to understand English. Patients agreed to involvement of students; taking histories (95.3%), examination (88.5%), looking at reports (96.6) and presence during consultation (88.3 %). Patients' perceived no change in duration (55%) or quality (56.3%) of the consultation due to the presence of students. The majority (78%) preferred if doctor student interaction took place in their native language. 45.8% expected prior notice regarding student participation and two to three students were the preferred number. 93.6% considered their participation as a social service and only 8.8% expected a payment. Conclusion: The vast majority of the patients accepted the presence of students and were willing to participate in this education process without any reservation. Their wishes should be respected. The outcome of this study is an encouragement to educationists and GP teachers.