Aim To evaluate the efficacy and safety of fast‐acting insulin aspart (faster aspart) vs insulin aspart (IAsp) used in continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) in participants with type 1 diabetes (T1D). Materials and Methods This was a double‐blind, treat‐to‐target, randomized, 16‐week trial investigating CSII treatment with faster aspart (n = 236) or IAsp (n = 236). All available information, regardless of treatment discontinuation, was used for the evaluation of effect. Results Faster aspart was non‐inferior to IAsp regarding the change from baseline in glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c; primary endpoint). The mean HbA1c changed from 58.4 mmol/mol (7.5%) at baseline to 57.8 mmol/mol (7.4%) with faster aspart and to 56.8 mmol/mol (7.4%) with IAsp after 16 weeks' treatment, with an estimated treatment difference (ETD) of 1.0 mmol/mol (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.14; 1.87) or 0.09% (95% CI 0.01; 0.17; P < 0.001) for non‐inferiority (0.4% margin; P < 0.02 for statistical significance in favour of IAsp). Faster aspart was superior to IAsp in change from baseline in 1‐hour postprandial glucose (PPG) increment after a meal test (ETD −0.91 mmol/L [95% CI −1.43; −0.39] or −16.4 mg/dL [95% CI −25.7; −7.0]; P = 0.001), with statistically significant reductions also at 30 minutes and 2 hours. The improvement in PPG was reflected in the change from baseline in 1‐hour interstitial glucose increment after all meals (ETD −0.21 mmol/L [95% CI −0.31; −0.11] or −3.77 mg/dL [95% CI −5.53; −2.01]). There was no statistically significant difference in the overall rate of severe or blood glucose‐confirmed hypoglycaemia (estimated rate ratio 1.00 [95% CI 0.85; 1.16]). A numerical imbalance in severe hypoglycaemic episodes between faster aspart and IAsp was seen in the treatment (21 vs 7) and 4‐week run‐in periods (4 vs 0). Conclusions Faster aspart provides an effective and safe option for CSII treatment in T1D.

Essentials explorer™3 was a double-blinded, multiple-dose escalation trial of subcutaneous concizumab. A pharmacodynamic relationship for unbound TFPI and thrombin generation was confirmed. No serious adverse events and no anti-drug antibodies were observed. explorer™3 data support further clinical development of concizumab in people with hemophilia. SUMMARY: Background Concizumab is a humanized mAb targeting tissue factor pathway inhibitor (TFPI), leading to enhanced thrombin generation (TG) potential. explorer™3 (NCT02490787) was a phase 1b, double-blind, multiple-dose escalation trial of subcutaneous concizumab in people with severe hemophilia A without inhibitors. Objectives The primary objective was to evaluate safety. Assessments of pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and subcutaneous concizumab immunogenicity were secondary objectives. Patients/Methods Adverse events (AEs), clinical assessments and bleeding episodes were recorded. Plasma concizumab levels and unbound TFPI levels were measured with ELISAs; residual TFPI activity was measured with a chromogenic assay. Standardized assays were used to assess TG, D-dimer and prothrombin fragment 1 + 2 (F ) levels. explorer™3 was completed after investigation of three dose cohorts (0.25, 0.5 and 0.8 mg kg , once every 4 days) had been completed. Twenty-four patients received 12 doses of concizumab or placebo in a 3 : 1 randomization over a 42-day period. Results No serious AEs and no anti-drug antibodies were observed. Fifty-four mild and two moderate AEs were observed in 19 patients. Concizumab exposure increased with dose in a non-linear manner, confirming target-mediated drug disposition. D-dimer and F levels were increased mostly in the highest dose cohort, in line with previous observations. The level of unbound TFPI decreased in a dose-dependent manner, and was accompanied by a residual TFPI activity decrease and an increase in peak TG. Although the trial was not powered to evaluate efficacy, a trend towards lower bleeding rates was observed in patients in the highest dose cohort. Conclusion explorer™3 data support further clinical development of concizumab for use in people with hemophilia, with or without inhibitors.

Key Points von Willebrand factor in its glycoprotein Ib conformation predicts 28-day mortality and could be a useful addition to the APACHE-IV score.

Rivaroxaban and Apixaban, increasingly used for stroke prevention in non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF), might impact platelet reactivity directly or indirectly. By inhibition of Factor Xa (FXa) they preclude not only generation of relevant thrombin amounts but also block signalling of FXa via protease activated receptors. However, weather FXa-inhibition affects platelet haemostasis remains incompletely known. One hundred and twenty-eight patients with AF on chronic anticoagulation with either Rivaroxaban or Apixaban for at least 4 weeks were included in the study. In a time course group (25 on Rivaroxaban, 13 on Apixaban) venous blood samples were taken before NOAC medication intake in the morning as well as 2 and 6 h afterwards. In 90 patients (Rivaroxaban n = 73, Apixaban n = 17) blood samples were drawn during left atrial RFA procedures before as well as 10 and 60 min after the first heparin application (RFA group). Platelet reactivity analyzed by whole blood aggregometry (Multiplate Analyzer, Roche) in response to ADP, Collagen, TRAP and ASPI (arachidonic acid) was not altered by Rivaroxaban or Apixaban neither in the time course nor in the RFA group. Moreover, soluble P-selectin, Thrombospondin, von Willebrand Factor and beta thromboglobulin plasma levels, measured by ELISA, showed no statistically significant changes in both clinical settings for either FXa-inhibitor. The present study fails to demonstrate any significant changes on platelet reactivity in patients with AF under chronic Rivaroxaban or Apixaban medication, neither for trough or peak levels nor in case of a haemostatic activation in vivo as depicted by RFA procedures.

PG, van Deuren M. von Willebrand factor activation, granzyme-B and thrombocytopenia in meningococcal disease. J Thromb Haemost 2010; 8: 1098-106.Summary. Background: During invasive meningococcal disease, severe thrombocytopenia is strongly associated with a poor outcome. Objectives: In order to elucidate the pathophysiological mechanism behind the development of thrombocytopenia, we studied the role of von Willebrand factor (VWF) in meningococcal disease. Patients/methods: Thirty-two children with severe meningococcal disease admitted to our university hospital were included in this study. VWF and related parameters were measured and results were correlated with the development of shock and thrombocytopenia. Results: At admission, all patients had increased levels of (active) VWF and VWF propeptide. The highest VWF propeptide levels were observed in patients with shock, indicating acute endothelial activation. Although VWF propeptide levels in patients with shock, with or without thrombocytopenia, were similar, increased active VWF was significantly lower in patients with thrombocytopenia as compared with patients without thrombocytopenia. ADAMTS13 was moderately decreased. However, the VWF multimeric pattern was minimally increased. We assume that these findings are explained by VWF consumption and perhaps by granzyme B (GrB). In vitro experiments showed that GrB is able to cleave VWF multimers in plasma, whereas GrB was high in patients with shock, who developed thrombocytopenia. Conclusions: Our results demonstrate that consumption of VWF, derived from endothelial cells, could be a key feature of meningococcal disease and primary to the development of thrombocytopenia during shock.